It’s funny how you guys are still arguing about guns. Germans have better firepower, but Americans have better mobility. Running around with an mg34/42 actually sucks; it’s heavy and you need to find a good position.
On the other hand, Americans can storm through anywhere and fire effectively. Their rifles are better, and the grease gun is pretty controllable, plus high damage.
That being said, once the Americans push through a point, the Germans can’t reinforce it fast enough. That’s where tank imbalance comes in. If you think about it, infantry is kind of balanced. What’s not balanced is the Sturmpistol going against the Jumbo Sherman. Germans can’t make a counter play, but slowly die only. Wtf?
How is this related to guns? You can have the best guns ingame but if you are just too stupid to relocate fast enough/ use the guns proberly its not the fault of the guns. At the end the biggest differences are the MGs and the AT weapons and despite the bugged Sturmpistole I doubt that they are that game-decising, otherwise we would face odd win rates (not only in France, but also in Soviet Russia).
German MGs (MG34 and 42) have more ammo, bigger clip size and better rof while which would make them technically even better at CQC since you are better at hipfiring than with the U.S. “machine gun” (Again the BAR isnt even a machine gun but more like a battle rifle).
Also what is “heavy”? Its not like in BFV where you cant go ADS with certain MGs without using bipods or that we are talking about tripods. You can go ADS anytime you want and they even have better recoil than the BAR models.
Slower ADS time cripples that hard?
You can’t reliably fight with ADS with an mg34/42. So basically it’s heavy, you run slow with it, and you have to find a spot to go prone or mount it. It sucks anyway, because airplanes/tanks/aimbotters will kill you
Another one who thinks that nerfing while moving affected non-moving too.
You wanna play a MG with real recoil? Play DP-27 with a recoil of 41,17 and complain about the (vertical) recoil of MG34 (which is 15,19). Heck. The recoil of the BARs is around 34-41/ 15.
Yep, but you can actually move with the bar. You can’t move fast with the mg34/42. Do you understand my point? You’ll get to a point faster, and mount the weapon. Plus you can tap fire with the BAR, not sure bout the dp 27.
Germans mg gunners are slow, and my ai’s usually get killed before I get to a point. Kinda lame. Basic things don’t work in Enlisted, you have aim assist aim botters, and over powered tanks
AI always get killed before they can get useful. Thats the job of the AI ^^
At least on console. Idk if this possible on PC too.
Depends on how do you play tanks (excpetions: Berlin and the Jumbo (mostly cause its non historical and to some extend bugged which makes its front almost undamagable).
I’m trying to illustrate the fact that weapons have pros and cons, and it doesn’t actually matter who has better fire power. You sacrifice mobility and vice versa. So why are you guys trying to argue with me about what gun is better? I’m illustrating a single point.
That’s what I was saying. It doesn’t even matter. What matters is how the tanks/anti tank are imbalanced in France. Allies got more actual human players on their team. I know because the ai’s will run and sit at the point, and once the allies put in artillery, there’s 1 guy sitting in the point, all the ai’s go sit outside the red circle. That’s crazy
[quote=“Josephs_Piano, post:66, topic:22512”]
On average German winrate on Normandy is below 30% …
[/quote] Most Axis teams aren’t very good is the issue in my experience. one game I had a panther camping the grey zone, so I drove my tank Infront of him to block his view till he moved and supported the team. Panthers and Jumbos have no reason to grey zone camp the scumbags
