New update seems underwhelming

[adamatry]

sure we got one new map which i do like
but in terms on content…its supposed be a major update but it only added 2 tech tree guns and 5 vehicles … i thought since we have tech tree they would add more content more frequently but it seems not to be the case and ofc how can i not forget 4 premium squads yay

[khtk395]

@adamatry

its supposed be a major update but it only added 2 tech tree guns and 5 vehicles …

7 stuff, it is similar to previous major updates.

@adamatry

i thought since we have tech tree they would add more content more frequently but it seems not to be the case

How does tech tree have anything to do with add more content frequently?

[adamatry]

cuz its not seperated to campaign thus adding middle early war stuff would be easier than it was in linear campaigns where they did not add levels in the middle or the start of the progression

[adamatry]

i do remember when we got like “3 levels” for each faction and usually new map or even more than one

[Ron_McKracker]

I suggested that they add something else almost two weeks ago, but I guess they just didn’t care. Other people brought up other weapons that could’ve been added as well.

Add Ithaca 37 in the Rzhev update

In a major update with only a single gun and a tank for the Americans, it feels very lackluster; that is why I believe it would be perfect to reach into the editor and add the Ithaca 37 to the game. You already have the model and the animations for it; all that it needs is its camera to be set up. [image] [image] I would also like to say that this gun has been requested for a long time, and now would be the time to add it. The weather is perfect for a new shotgun in Enlisted.

[adamatry]

.>update focused on 1942-43 battle
.>adds late war guns,vehicles (expect the pz4g and t34 57)
.>kv2 and flakbus being early-mid war are premium smh
where marder,valentines,spitfires,t80,SPAAs?
where mid war stuff

[khtk395]

@adamatry

cuz its not seperated to campaign thus adding middle early war stuff would be easier than it was in linear campaigns where they did not add levels in the middle or the start of the progression

I don’t really think it is a limiting factor. More likely because of they lack the efficiency.

@adamatry

i do remember when we got like “3 levels” for each faction and usually new map or even more than one

Those are rather early updates. Their pace of adding new stuff become slower on recent year. Maybe because those 3 levels stuff are already made long ago.

[adamatry]

its just underwhelming is all was expecting more for german,soviet side since thats what the update was supposed to be about and also them making rzhev br5 ugh why not at least br4 max

[khtk395]

@adamatry

its just underwhelming is all was expecting more for german,soviet side since thats what the update was supposed to be

The problem is every faction needs their stuff. Soviet and Germany clearly doesn’t need that much focus consider that Japan and US are still lacking several stuff. I can see you are still using the campaign mindset from the past. It is over, they are just some maps.

@adamatry

and also them making rzhev br5 ugh why not at least br4 max

That is how current br works.

[adamatry]

some maps well battle of rzhev is soviet/germany focused so lil bit more content couldnt hurt,well they can clearly limit the brs so

[khtk395]

@adamatry

well they can clearly limit the brs so

So why should rzhev receive special treatment?

[mergenthewise]

at least it didnt broke the game or create new bugs.