New battlefield - Burma

don’t you think is more plausible they get their IS-3 than some land lease tank not needed anymore ?

my point is japan is more likely to get an is 1 is 2 captured than make their own tiger tanks, heavy tank 5 is only slightly less a fantasy then hi-ro 1

yet there is no evidence of US lend leasing a Pershing or super perishing to USSR and if even by a miracle war had continued for 1 year USSR wouldn’t have received a single pershing since they had already made T44s and a lot of tanks and wouldnt need american tanks unlike in years earlier and as always Japan purchased the Tiger for 645K reich mark which were paid fully and hence Japan owned the tank unless buying isnt equals owning even if it didn’t reach Japan it was owned by Japan

1 Like

yes which i have said over and over means they had a Tiger tank, without the ability to a receive it or b make more of them. they would also lack c the ability to transport it or d the ability to maintain and supply it. America made and deployed two nuclear bombs should the United States have the a-bomb in their arsenal i mean they had twice as many as Japan had tigers. on a side note the brooklyn bridge was bought and sold many time look it up. George C. Parker - Wikipedia

Should Germany receive maus since it had twice as much as America had super pershing ?

The question isn’t if they could maintain the tank which they could 645k was the price for Tiger tank ammunition , Mg ammunition , spare parts , radios, optics and blueprints for tank so if the tank reached ,hypothetically Japan could have maintained and used it and second of all you make it sound that Japan having a tiger is bad I dont understand why people act like Japan getting a tiger is bad is it for historical reasons ? surely you have looked at TT and even premiums to know the game isn’t historically accurate it follows a guideline , other than that it reduced faction uniqueness? hmm good point maybe I should ask M3A1 halftrack which America made but soviets use and Veekay45 fond out around 50 to 200 were delivered to USSR or maybe I have to talk about 100 round tommys that soviet got as event or lewis guns that soviet had as premiums maybe Arisaka rifles that they got as premiums what about Breda machine guns and Thompsons that they had as unlock in Stalingrad or what about Panzerfaust if even one of these is justifiable for balance then Tiger tank is in the same boat or if you can justify them in any sense same could be applied to tiger , I wouldn’t mind seeing a Tiger event for Japan or even as premium , heck I would like to see it in TT but people will lose their mind

2 Likes

again that would be one tiger tank with what six months to live if not destroyed, the only reason for it to exist is balance. yes the Ho-ri is an abomination as is the prototype. sorry but not going to wave the white flag for history ruining additions.

One simple question no matter the weapon, could they have made more. thats why i added nukes to my question, just like nukes japan could not just make more of them. point to one weapon outside the ho-r1 that is a prototype that could not have been made in number. i am sure the ussr could make halftracks and the us could make german at rockets.

Yeah but are we talking about the game or real life ? what’s the point of them making more, Japan IRL never bought the tiger to make more of them in first place they bought the tiger to study it and apply the stuff they learned from the tank examination on their tanks , that’s IRL and since this is game some concessions have to be made unless you want a single faction to suffer endlessly Tiger is such a thing and also it is already modeled in WT so might as well add it unless devs want to go out of their way to make a model for Heavy tank number 4 which as it seems was partially built


(Turret of HTN.4 (allegedly) used as static defense in Manchuria)
The better option would be O-I but that’s a 11 man tank beside the problem navigating Island maps what would stop me to use it as a super assaulter squad with 11 assaulters

Oh here a picture Japanese tiger being used by Japanese (Though these officers were only testing the tank in Henschel facility if Im not mistaken )
image
Anyway man lets agree to disagree I want to see tiger in game you dont thats OK

3 Likes

World of Tanks Type 4 Heavy | 4.900+ DMG | 9 kills - Malinovka - YouTube all of that aside it breaks the most important rule of not being boring cope paste. i like the hori more than the heavy type 5 why the ho-ri is original (too original) but original. imagine instead of the type 5 hei otsu we got the zh-29, garand and pedersen, boring. if you are going to break history do not just copy paste.

1 Like

You talking about soviets

Also beside the point but the tank as far as I know is Heavy tank number 4 and not 5 but both look identical so who knows

I seriously believe that if everyone keeps swallowing DF’s BS and no one raises concerns over the BS they’re recently adding , then just as they ruined high BR they’ll ruin low BR games in the game I’ve been playing for 4 years.

And sorry not sorry, I don’t want that to happen.

1 Like

lmao their latest update will be letting chinese volunteers liberate tunisia, stop with the copium and realize that your personal version of enlisted is not possible

4 Likes

so darkflow is breaking the game lets demand that they break it more quickly. enlisted will change for the better and for the worse but dont ask them to trash the game. ho-ri is a necessary evil, that is japan needs to be br5 like all other factions. adding cold war weapons like the m14, ak47, and t54, and pzv 44 are not.

4 Likes

Well, it’s purely his delusional dogma that historical WW2 prototypes are not part of the WW2 history and thus they shouldn’t be included in game that’s based on WW2.

I really don’t see the logic there. But it is what it is. :man_shrugging:

1 Like

Prove me wrong but Veekay always pushed for standard common infantry weapons.
Which in itself is a good HA principle but not very realistic in a free to play progression based game.
By the time of the merge Stalingrad had the most realistic progression line and even in that, most players preferred playing with the more unique and less standard weapons such as the Mannlicher M93 and 1895, Winchester 1895, Mp717(r), AVT-40 ect. Proving that players care more about variety and fun than pure historical accuracy.

5 Likes

agree otherwise germany and russia would have to play by themselves leaving us and japan to fight in the pacific.

1 Like

i want to play enlisted because its enlisted i dont want to play red orchestra disguised in a trench coat

2 Likes

Well Enlisted nailed the coffin on Heroes and Generals and Red Orchestra.

1 Like

Yes, he always blindly followed his weird dogma like a true fanatic.

I’m certainly not taking that away from him.

1 Like

One of the few constants in this chaotic world.

2 Likes

It would be sheer naivety to think developers will remove all prototypes, WW1 weapons and so (or just stop adding them).
Especially after the developers added the CRSED event and the “demon” tank.

I believe he’s now trashing these things just to ruin the day for people who actually enjoy and are excited about them.

It’s just annoying spam at this point, nothing else. Always the same thing over and over again.

2 Likes