completely right mp40 is a really balanced and good weapon I have one in real life as well, a Semi auto one to bad it doesn`t have the hit power like the thompson
then they kill you.EXACTLY
AXIS OP NERF
Well that is a matter of opinion, I like the grease guns more than the MP 40, but yeah OP has major skill issue.
MY GOD WHAT A WILD CONCEPT ENEMYS THAT CAN HIT SHOTS AND KILL YOU!
you must be really funny in real life …
“no british in the game” Yeah not like the firefly and churchill squad exists, not like tunisia exists. though on a serious note the simplest solution that i believe most of the community would be for is replacing the screaming eagles with an SAS or any other commonwealth squad
I see your an CBT who has been playing for a long time so your gonna defend your stupid little unbalanced game and simply just defend everything becuase you`ve been playing for a long time.
Typicial enlisted closed beta tester.
im not talking about axis here. Iam talking about allies
nah. i m not defending nothing. lmao. i couldnt care less if was nerfed or not. wouldnt loose a single min of sleep over it.
i m just trying to understand your arguments so far
besides spiting random shit , so far you havent made a single valid point why the gun must be nerfed,
i know why.
because it doesnt need an nerf.
the argument of “more bolt actions” is a personal taste on how the game should be played for you. for you and some other players. but isnt what enlisted is. you have exacly the same right to use that gun type as everyone here. if you choose to rambo a bolt action, expect to die to any smg user.
im talking about infantry I know british tanks are in game
Nah, that wouldn’t fix anything, they Americans are going to get the Sten again in Guadalcanal because the Americans lack any low tier SMGs and the Royal Australian Navy was technically there.
i just want sten mk5 into the game, seen it in real life got to hold it and it was beautiful :c
That is how closed Beta testers are you`ll probably defend every single little thing in the game like military ranks which no one wanted getting to marshal which takes a huge grind and yet get nothing you probably support that as well you closed beta testers are so cringy
Laugh’s in 4 Man Drum Mag Thompson + 8 Impact Grenades Assault Squad
(I also have a 4 Man Lanchester Assault squad, and a 3 Man Sten + 1 Shotgun Assault squad and wreck people all the same with those squads too, when I choose to use them over my Thompson squad)
lol look at your answers so far.
https://forum.enlisted.net/u/98547181 ← take as much as you want to see what i defend ot not.
you can even go to day one when i joined.
isnt that great?
now cope.
becuase they can hop around and dodge shots? no one did that in real life all this game is now like i said is a craphole.I simply cant believe you guys are defending the thompson when it
s really more OP then the ppsh41.
the ranks literally just tell me whos actually competent/fucking insufferable on the enemy team. Theres no incentive to grind that.
how is that related to a thompson? cant you do the same with your bolt action?
we all here can argue that the game needs beter movement mechanics. sure . but how is that a thompson smg problem? lol
another hot take…
you are on fire!
They have lots of weapons and I use every. Last. One.
I still use G43s in all campaigns. I use bolts (seriously, use the rifle grenades, TKOs those pesky assault squads).
End of the day you are ranting like a child who just is not getting his way.
Maybe perhaps make a constructive post on what you think can balance the game. I have. Will it ever work? Probably not, but trying in a concise way without ranting gets a lot more recognition.
You can kill with everything in this game. Play to your strengths.
Uh not really? The only reason the PPSh is so bad is because it’s matched with the 20 round M38 which is significantly inferior. Meanwhile the Thompsons are matched with things like MP 40s or 40 round MABs, which while not a perfect match, all of them have advantages over the Thompson if played correctly.