Fair argument, but the super Pershing still has a similar performance to the regular Pershing. Still struggles to penetrate/ is frontally penetrated by the Tiger 2. I don’t see it being an issue as a premium.
1 Like
Well, in that case T29 or T30 would have to be top tech tree US tank.
But that’s basically even more “rare” than Super Pershing. Suepr Pershing was in combat. If I remember correctly.
6 Likes
Super Pershing was in combat but there was only 1 out of the 2 actually in Europe.
1 Like
again relevancy? shall i list all of the weapons that were either obsolete (not used in combat in ww2), were designed as prototypes or were even just paper weapons but we still have them in tech tree?
3 Likes
Go for it, I’ve already acknowledged that there are already too many prototypes in the tech tree. Hence why I don’t want it there. I dislike it but majority of them are there to fill holes for balancing reasons.
1 Like
well super pershing should also be there for balancing reasons.
4 Likes
Wouldn’t really make a difference, both Pershings preform similar.
1 Like
but one has much better penetration(40-50mm extra) giving it more area where it could penetrate KT and has some extra armor that will help with survivability.
1 Like
I feel alot of people forget this: The devs tend to add only what a nation needs and nothing more to keep everything balanced. (Past stuff like the KV-1 with a different gun at B.R 4)
Logically the US would probably only need a better AR at this point.
If they add a Super Persh to the game, You can expect the Japanese may get something new as well.
2 Likes
I love the prototypes in this game…that were built and functional during WWII. Everything from before Germany invaded Poland to the Japanese’s unconditional surrender on the USS Missouri, if it had a functional prototype then it’s fair game far as I care and far as the devs have stated. Paper bullcrap I can definitely live without. There are a lot of firearms I never even knew existed before seeing them in this game, and I love that
1 Like
The uh, well I like to call them “Heavy Pershing Variants” as they were all built on lengthened Pershing chassis, but heavy prototypes we made dead end and right after end of the war. Yeah, I’d definitely like to own some Krauts in them things
1 Like
My dude, you might aswell quit now if you don’t wish to see more prototypes added to the game. The Super Pershing is definitely coming, it’s been confirmed. You’re pointlessly arguing about nothing, while being ridiculed the entire time due to your stubbornness and poor arguments (using number of units in combat while other nations are filled to the brim with actual fictional weapons and vehicles).
2 Likes
Seriously. The US doesn’t have a single paper weapon or vehicle anywhere in its TT meanwhile everyone else has at least 1 if not several. We can get ourselves a couple more prototypes to even the playing field
1 Like
There was a news thread announcing Tokyo Arsenal and that batch of Japan weapons and other vehicles. Pershing and Super Pershing and Ho-Ri were announced but it was said not ready for the updated. After someone asked, Euthymia (Helper) replied that “these” are tech tree.
The question is, does “these” include Super Pershing? I’d say yes based on how I read it but we all know that nothing is final until it’s final. Or later.
edit… “all of these”
https://forum.enlisted.net/en/t/weapons-and-vehicles-of-the-next-update/131951/14
4 Likes
No he’s not the only one who knows this, again, you’re embarassing yourself.
I’d gladly say eat your own words but since it’s not totally clear if it’s referencing everything or just what was coming on that update, I’ll leave it open to interpretation.
3 Likes
Lmao I’m allowed to have my own personal opinion champ. Seems you’re the one who has a stick up your shitter. Ahh yes the info from a helper in a dev blog about other equipment. Is that the best you can scrape together? I’ll believe it when a developer says it in a dev blog about the super Pershing.
1 Like
Only embarrassment here is you, trying to jump on someone else’s argument. Do your own research if you’re trying to shoot down someone’s opinion/argument. Lazy.
1 Like
Highly doubt he was referring to the super Pershing. Most likely referring to the other equivalent that was coming to the game at that time. I appreciate you taking the time to find it but I’ll believe it when an actual developer says it in a post dedicated to it.
1 Like
I don’t think that she has ever posted anything incorrectly that I’ve noticed. But the dev’s can change course and the wording certainly isn’t air tight given that 3 tanks were NOT in that update. But 2 of those 3 are now out (Pershing and Ho-Ri) and are tech tree. They were in the same gray area as were not included in the release at the time.
@Euthymia07 maybe can clarify?
Otherwise… We’ll see!
1 Like
Fair, we’ll see.
1 Like