I do not agree with your opinion Even now in Normandy, several users are slaughtering noobs with fg. You should try it. If the noobs lose interest in automatic rifles and don’t play, are you responsible?
try what ? Semi action rifles ?
I’ve been sayin that since the start of that dumb nerf… But somehow peoples who are known to only spam assaulters and lmg squads told me to shut up and were quite happy with the nerf (of a weapon type they don’t use)
Not only that, feels… wrong and unrealistic.
5 Likes
I made a post pointing this out, advocation for balance by nerfing full auto FG’s rate of fire too, as this makes no sense (only that players would just switch to full auto to avoid it anyway).
Many treated me as troll, and to be fair i also added flamethrowers to balance mix for lols.
But now we have PTRS with reduced rate of fire, semi autos remain just as shit, and they only made M1 (and vg? idk) slightly better, yet i still won’t touch that weapon again even with a stick, and it was one of my favourites before.
Every new update just makes it harder to new guys to compete, as power creep gives us veterans more and betrter toys, with little benefit of using old guns.
Honestly seeing bots running around with better guns that new players just makes me sad.
Sure it is rly balanced when SF rifle can fire as fast as he can while SA firing at restricted RoF. Balanced? My dog at home would be better balanced than this.
Because firing SF rifles in semi auto isn’t as stressfull 
2 Likes
Yep. When you have Select-fire rifle you become a sigma male and no fear
It’s not only automatic rifles. In every campaign, higher lvl players can spam assaulters and gunners only, with high end versions of smgs and lmgs.
Before the nerf, a semi auto held by a low lvl player could allow him to survive 1 or maybe 2 smg grunt charging ahead (in close quarters). Now it’s not really advisable.
Nerf was dumb in every way and did the opposite of what it was supposed to do. It ruined balance.
1 Like
well thing is that i understand why they got nerfed because i understand the power behind them. This also since they are both accurate in hip firing which usually ex FG42 are not but also they are more powerful at range. So imagine if you got lesser kickback perk and rapid lazer shots from range as well as in short range…well then you dont need assault rifles do ya 
What comes next split second BAs to just because someone can do it irl ?
Why nerf?
Is it for balance? No
Is it for realism? No
Is it for fun of playing such weapon? No
Ia it for make player suffer so they grind more, buy premium, purchase golden eagle, and spend them? Yeeeees
4 Likes
3 Likes
No… I wrote the wrong thing for you to get hit once, and I can do it too… I don’t know if the record is high…
Well thing is also that there should be a progression in weaponry asw. But saying that SAs are weak against Assault rifles are bit of an overstatement. They are very much lethal against everyone in close engagements asw of which isnt their effective range to add…SAs are for mid range support not assault. But dont forget that were also comparing mid range weaponry against high end. Its like saying why cant my middle tank compete against that hvy tank this good. Same for planes
I don’t understand what you’re saying… To say that SAs are weaker than assault rifles is an understatement? SAs are lethal in close engagements? What nonsense is it? It’s absolutely true that the SA gets beaten by the assault rifle. So, do you think the Garand is stronger than the STG? Do you think the Gewehr 41 is stronger than the PPSH? And any weapon is lethal in close combat, as is the pistol… And medium-range weapons and high-end weapons must be able to compete at least as much as NOOBs in the game. I’m interested. And when you’re talking about infantry weapons, why are you talking about tanks? Is it blurring the point? It’s disgusting
Yes G41 is stronger then PPSH in mid range engagements and can still make 1 kill head shots at longer ranges. But you can also one hit down an ppsh user if youre quicker on the draw in close so theres that to.
But youre comparing two kinds of weaponry to, like youre comparing an Assault rifle with an DMR, Well sure SAs could also be seen as assault rifles but to me they are an middle breed of both BA and Assault duty but most of all close support in my book
And you can actually kill tanks with knife, if your opponent ( tank ) is stupid enough to come out of tank if you politely ask him to come out to die.
But reality is quite different.
maybe your reality but not mine
Damn I wish everyone could be in your reality then.
Casually stabbing tanks to death & destroying PPSh’s with SA
1 Like
havnt said this at all but seems that ppl want an SA that acts like an Smg or an Assault rifle at early stage, thats clr for sure ^^
Neither smg or AR has limitations of being able to burst only for what ever reason, why should SA rifles then have ROF limitation ?