Most of the Soviet br5 tech need to be nerfed

Shpitalney have such a weak stats for a 5 br. Its mostly a gun for fun. Axis PPSh mp 717 better. About Tommies - I aint use it much - autorifles have a better time to kill, so its obviously another for fun squad.

1 Like

Fucking lmao. At what scenario does this gun even starts resembling the best weapon in the game

If you lay somethere and start to push left mouse button I suppose. Thats how mg plays in this game sometimes

Although they can penetrate each other, the problem is that the armor and anti-infantry capabilities of these two tanks are significantly inferior to those of the Tiger II. They should be regarded specifically as tools designed to counter the Tiger II, rather than as general-purpose anti-infantry vehicles. The Tiger II is also capable of penetrating both of these tanks from long range. Even without considering the vulnerability of their weak spots—which amount to only about 0.4 m² on the frontal area—these two tanks remain highly vulnerable in the presence of the Tiger II.

The RD-44’s use of an intermediate cartridge means it was essentially destined to be little more than a scaled-up PPSH. When put up against a full-power cartridge weapon like the MG-42, it immediately falls short. As a superior platform firing full-power rounds, the MG-42/100 rightfully deserves its title as the most powerful machine gun.

The historical rate of fire of the 20-round AVT-40 has still not been restored to this day.
The FG42 II can also be equipped with a bayonet — provided that DF becomes aware of this feature. I too want to have a bayonet mounted.
In top-tier matches, a few extra rounds make a significant difference. It means that when two squads engage, there’s a better margin for error.
Besides, the FG42 II has been a light machine gun from the very beginning. The fact that DF allows regular infantry to widely use a weapon typically reserved for machine gunners is already a special privilege.

Limited-time event squads are not available to everyone — they’re not even part of the regular tech tree, and very few players have them. As a result, they have little impact on the overall battle outcome.

Did you mean this gun in the game?

It still is in Br 2

Way too slow of a gameplay for BR5

Most of your engagements are in crouching position because it allows you to stay mobile, laying down when you spot an enemy takes too much times and will kill you, and camping somewhere with MG set up is just too slow and limits your map presence

Not to mention that even then you’re better off with MG42-100, because if you finally set-up somewhere, lower firerate allows you to hold fire for longer while still having great TTK

Overall MG-81 is largely a meme gun, because firerate is too excessive to aim it properly in standing/crouching position and even if you set it up you bleed way more bullets and diminish your ability to kill enemies en masse

MG42-100 at least can be shot in burst to be able to play longer range engagements and holds fire for longer

RD-44 can be shot in full auto in crouching position while still 2 shotting enemies. It eliminates your need to set it up and instead allows you to just spray away. This combined with better sprint speed factor allows you to play more aggressively and have more presence in the game. But even then if you want to set it up you can - sure it will be little worse (and I mean very little because the firerate difference is minimal) than MG42-100 at that but it just excels and way more impactful and ought-to-be common scenarios

Soviets BR2 is still better, not by alot but still are, especially since the Winchester got buffed and Pz3M got moved to BR3

PPS-43, T28E, Winchester and P40E-1 combo is just every so slightly more powerful