Just check rof of 75mm pz 4 gun…
Why do we need machine guns that are reduced in damage, with overheating, when there is a 75mm machine gun that a squad can kill for a shot?
1 Like
yeah, i like both , when t-28 comes into its own situation where it shines (and there certainly are good spots in the maps where the tank has good anti infantry mowing capabilities) then i like it too , but its easy to get stuck with it , also because its so big it can be spot with airplane from above more easily, its machine guns are reloading long and overheats very long imo, also its cannon reloads longer than pz4
its shells are mostly one hit wonder… dont know if german ones on pz4 behave the same but , pz 4 is beautiful tank overall, agile, fast turret, also powerful wundershells
as a player who play both sides i can destroy a t34 whit pz 3 J
basically if you face a t 34 do not face it as if you had a tank capable of destroying it, you have to beat it intelligently, destroy its tracks and flank it
1 Like
Historical accuracy is good to a point but I dont play games for history lessens I play them for fun. One side having near invulnerable tanks that in some cases give them a massive advantage is not fun. It makes some rounds so one sided that there is no point playing.
But all they have to do is get one good hit on you so this is not possible in the vast majority of cases.
Super Flank and toss an explosive pack on his buttocks and see how he likes them berries
I needed 8 hits with AT-gun to destroy one T-34. I had big luck that I could shoot him at the side.
In my opinion - OK, realistic… but unbalanced and overpowered.
What you think do with a 50mm aganaist a tank wo need a 75mm
Worst tanker ever.