The panzer 2 kills the t-28 if hit him from the side op probably never tried to kill a tank from the side
Why does everyone insults the tiny t-60??? I like the thing, it’s the perfect infantry support, even (maybe) more so than the t28, thanks to it’s low profile and maneuverability. People forget the most important use of tanks: support infantry first. Sure it’s not good against other tanks… because it’s not the purpose of it!
(Also, it’s armour is Godly for a starter tank.)
2 Likes
Because everyone loves his big brother the t-70 which I hope they add on moscow
Because German side is more easy at higher tier. And that’s why I always to prefer play German. MG34 and PZ4E is so much better than DP and T-28.
SMG just useless if you have LMG.
Because you have to at least have some ability at AT side.
T60 can only penaltrate PZ2C and 3B easily. While these two tanks are rare to see.
But PZ2C can penaltrate T-26 BT7 T-28 easily, those higher tier tanks.
As people levels up, I am more talking about game at higher tier situations.
You don’t absolutely NEED AT capability… t-60 is anti infantry and light vehicle only. It should be used as such, and let infantry deal with german tanks. To do so, the ptrd is LEAGUES ahead of the German AT, it counter balance easily.
And while a pz2 CAN pen a t26 from up close… the t26 canon may easily one shot said pz2. So there’s no issue here 
As for Moscow tanks… I’d say I like the balance there is. There’s nothing I cannot take out while in a bt7. Even the t26 being fast as a SNAIL (badum tss) has a good enough gun to take out any German tank. I honestly prefer soviet tanks up to the pz4/t28 tier to be honest (t28 is wonderful but too large for my play style) then it’s back to soviets with the t50 wich is simply perfect.
Edit: If you want to feel reassured a bit, t-34 AND KV2 were in alpha. Now against those, whatever lvl the Germans players will be, they won’t have much in term of tanks to counter them. To summarize, soviets aren’t weak, not by a long shot.
t-50 has 2 coaix but that’s a late unlike the 3b
Same argument could be said about t28 / pz4… t28 got what, 3 mgs firing at once? Pz4 got just 1, but has good HE. It’s asymmetrical yes, but I’m not ready to say one faction is absolutely better than the other when you take all the variables togheter
The pz3s got two coax mgs…but a very poor canon, while t26 and sexy bt7 got only one… but have a gun that can take out all german tanks provided they aim. No side got the upper hand over all the campaign progression bar.
2 Likes
bt7 is the best tank in moscow change my mind
I certainly won’t! Bt7 is sexy and I love it. Gets you very fast where you need to be and got a great gun. Bt7 can shoot pz4 in the ass with ease (most of the time they are too busy shelling infantry to notice you coming)
Then there’s the t-50. Now… now that’s a Victoria secret’s model.
1 Like
BA-11 is chad.
2 Likes
Ahah, that thing surprised me more than once when I made the mistake of underestimating it. “What is th… pfff ahahah it’s just a sh*** armoured car, I can k… oh. It one shot me.”
1 Like
Pz-39 is virgin
I love how one argue’s around Tanks/Planes….who care’s about them, use your spawn/boots, flank! Soviets/Allies are actually OP end games on All campaigns. LTP
And dont forget the people who just come with
1 Like
Yes
all campaigns? then why does germany gets an automatic rifle for everyone but assaulters and gunners, better mgs, and the ju-188 while america gets a wanna be smg, 2 BARs, a semi automatic garand for snipers with their only objectively OP piece of equipment being attackers that they can have either/or but not both and jumbo. yeah it doesn’t work if you actually think about
Can’t help ya if you don’t understand…USA Normandy is easy street! M2 is awesome if you know how to use it, Bar OP again user error if don’t get it, Tommy gun do I need to explain, attacking 75% of them me, two very good bombers vs one……??? You claim FG42 is awesome, I say not since you need ammo bags, I get two more grenades. MG42 is nice, again need ammo bags, I get two more explosive and slower/fast attack accuracy. Normandy is the definition of Allies dominance of three campaigns. Since you picked it, I see its a LTP issue or team problem
again it’s a wanna be SMG with awful sights, as much i love carbines i can’t pretend they are good because they simply are not, oh i do use carbine with only my assaulter and sniper not having carbines
op? when it has worse handling then mg34 as well as worse DPM
yet you can’t take out both but you can take out a fwk190 and a ju-188 oh the fwk190 has the same rocket that the bf110 just 1 less set
oh it use to have lmg ammo count since it was overlooked during ammo standardization though if it isn’t good then it wouldn’t hurt to give american troopers the BAR with of course reduced ammo
this is also due to ammo standardization where LMGs have 100 rounds or 2 mags which ever is greater, it just also happens that 42 and 34 have the 50 round mags which equals to 100 ammo.
And then there is Normandy where the Axis have very limited options to deal with an M4 let alone a Jumbo.
Normandy is such a strange campaign by the way. The early levels favor the Axis (while Puma is not unkillable for a Stuart, Puma definately has the upper had and the M8 Scott is straight garbage imo); Axis gets 2 good machineguns (FnaB and MP40) very early and while the Grease gun is good, they get jack all untill the shotgun;
then around lvl 15 it changes side to heavily favor the Allies with 500lb bombers and the M4’s which the Axis has either the gabage Sturmpistole to deal with or try and suicide with a Dynamite. For some reason the Panzers can’t pen the M4’s anywhere other than the backside which usually requires you to press into the enemy lines and flank or outmanouver the enemy tank (thankfully the Panzers are faster than the M4’s).
Also it’s so strange that I see so few people using mg’s in Normandy. Every other campaign is littered with mg42’s and such but not Normandy.