More of the new Enlisted

[TovarishToNy]

You better volunteer on getting a full wipe but only you and not everyone else.

[SexyTent]

@Keofox

We analyzed your feedback and decided to add an additional rule: matchmaking will try to find the battle location that best matches to the participant’s weapons. For example, if the set of all your weapons when playing for the USSR is more consistent with the early period of WWII, then you are more likely to end up in the Moscow winter or on the streets of Stalingrad.

This is a soft rule, so it will apply as long as matching such a session doesn’t hurt your wait time in the queue. The exception would be the Pacific. The U.S. side will only get into battles against Japan with early war weapons, as Japan does not currently have weapons and vehicles from the later stages of the war.

The Fedorov M1916 was developed before WW2, does it belong to the early war weapons in the classification of this game? Or is it a late war weapon?
If it is an early war weapon, I am afraid that there is no weapon that can compete with the Germans of the same period.
I would like the Fedorov M1916 to be a late war weapon regardless of the year it was developed.

[TUSUPOLISI69]

@SexyTent

The Fedorov M1916 was developed before WW2, does it belong to the early war weapons in the classification of this game? Or is it a late war weapon?
If it is an early war weapon, I am afraid that there is no weapon that can compete with the Germans of the same period.
I would like the Fedorov M1916 to be a late war weapon regardless of the year it was developed.

which is why locking stuff to certain time periods / maps aint working.

[Liah_Kim]

It can be mg34, bf109f2

[shbs]

It’s the matchmaker…dont care about weapon equality - yes its a good idea, but
I can predict the match outcome dependant on the number of “gold” team mates per side - works out about 90% of the time the more"gold" the near certainty chance to win - it’s the experience…upgrades to weapons, better soldiers, higher soldier level. Until you fix this, matchmaker doesn’t work out even.
Matchmaker changes would be better concentrating on a level playing field.
Cheers

[TUSUPOLISI69]

@shbs

It’s the matchmaker…dont care about weapon equality - yes its a good idea, but
I can predict the match outcome dependant on the number of “gold” team mates per side - works out about 90% of the time the more"gold" the near certainty chance to win - it’s the experience…upgrades to weapons, better soldiers, higher soldier level. Until you fix this, matchmaker doesn’t work out even.

While this is all true and to some extend only highlights the issue of disparity of equipment in different factions.
Id say its still a good start. Bot games we currently have are rather boring.

[WidowMakerUk73]

I think now let’s see, so long as I can earn XP in a custom which is identical to what we have now, please

It’s amazing how this post became toxic, people squabbling, seems to have calmed down again.

I am for HA, devs have acknowledged and we will just have to see, if it doesn’t work they will adjust it I have faith in @1942786 and the devs

[gastanofrizzi]

@WidowMakerUk73

It’s amazing how this post became toxic

Yep you are not wrong a summary of major complain here are

• plz dev i want play normandy 24H 7D forever dont le me play other map, dont remove campaign system

• plz dev do a full wipe for everyone i hate veteran

• plz dev i want spam automatic and WP granade i dont want use weak equipment and i dont want see people use weak equipment dont remove campaign system please and add Sbmm

• plz dev use my overcomplicated and harder MM to implement machtmaking, 110p% good idea for keep HA
  …

My best hope for the guy who need read this for make the next devblog

[Veekay45]

@SexyTent

I would like the Fedorov M1916 to be a late war weapon regardless of the year it was developed.

Fedorov shouldn’t have been nearly as powerful as they made it in the game.
At best – one per army gold order weapon for Moscow.
Being an unreliable WW1 full auto design for Arisaka cartridge only, it was barely ever used even during Barbarossa, let alone later stages of the war, where it belongs just as much as a Hellriegel or Ribeyrolles 1918.

---

Also, a couple questions for @1942786 /devs:

1. So for example I bought a gold order Pz III for Tunisia, because it’s actually a good tank there. With the tech tree system I will have about five other Pz III variants unlocked in other campaigns – can I refund the Tunisian Pz III and get my gold order back to buy something actually useful now?

2. If maps are now (softly) linked to the weapons used, does that mean a completely new German player with only “BR 1” gear (Vz 24, MP-25 and Pz II) will only/mostly get Moscow maps?

• Does that mean Tunisia, Normandy and Berlin maps will be “locked” for a new player and instead filled with “veteran” German players? (not optimal)
• Or does that mean the gear-to-map filter will be so “soft” that it will still place a plater with Vz 24, MP-25 and Pz II to Berlin maps? (not optimal at all, doesn’t make any sense)

PROPOSED SOLUTION:
Unlock all the starter weapons we have in each campaign right now for all new players by default, something like reserve vehicles in WT: e.g. VG-2, MP 3008, Pz IV J unlocked by default for Berlin.

[robihr]

or

• i havent read any of the previous topics, but i have better idea than devs/other community members

[Norther]

WT is a good game, without its FRUSTRATING repair system, it could very well have 50% more players spending in-game. I hope Enlisted NEVER falls for that mistake.

[SignatureBadAim]

pls change the flak for the engineers in other countries.

[Norther]

@Rickyd123

Please consider full wipe before this update. Game is relasing so its justified

Lol, no.

[jednotkaosn]

Mohu se zeptat co to bude za trest, když hraji bitvu v Moskvě
A mě se třeba zasekne hra z bitvy mě to vyhodí?

[Dregomz]

@Liah_Kim

It can be mg34, bf109f2

Mg34 can’t be used at mid ranges without bipod so you are already at huge disadvantage, and plane is just a plane it won’t win a game if enemies have squads full of fedorovs and are capturing points one after another. So nobody would play early war high tier equipment germans after the changes

[Dregomz]

@Norther

WT is a good game, without its FRUSTRATING repair system, it could very well have 50% more players spending in-game. I hope Enlisted NEVER falls for that mistake.

devs have already said they will never add repair costs and i hope it will stay that way

[Norther]

@Dregomz

devs have already said they will never add repair costs and i hope it will stay that way

[FastGT007]

Topic cleaned

Keep in mind that this is not the WarThunder Forum.

[Rickyd123]

wth are you responding to me for and not the actual poster

[CaptainSebekel]

Tbf they say a lot.