Depends. Both the Jumbo and the Panther are hard to kill on distance from tanks, AT cannons and AT weapons (and the Panther has to worry about like two tanks (and one of them is premium) which can pen it through the mantlet. And no Yankee wanna trade his beloved Jumbo for a TD) and CAS is another case since it depends a lot on marking and skill (people with one slot prefer tanks since they are easier to use/ master than planes). And for some reason, Normandy is the most popular campaign which kinda says a lot about the game and a significant amount of the players.
Tunsia is grey-zone heaven, especially with the Grant and the howitzer tank, but at least no one plays Tunisia.
You never played D-Day, Ver-Su, Airfield or the majority of Tunisian maps? Its not even the distance. The points on D-Day are usually ot even that far awya, yet people run more than 100m. And a Panzer sitting on the hills is able to counter those few small hills and trenches and dont get me started about Ver-Su.
Not all maps/ tanks are fine like in Moscow or Berlin.
solves with introducing TDs. ATcs are not to worry about anything if they are hidden well. except some awful maps. Normandy is popular for west, but even they should be tired to play it in every game again and again.
grey-zone heaven
aha, with all these house lines where no even armored car could stick it’s nose. and guns there seem to be even more ugly balanced than in Moskow
more than 100m
becuz it’s too hard for pleers to use tank as cover, and that’s what i’m talking about, nobody will use it as cover when every freakin enemy has nukepacks. so we have what we have
fine like Moscow/Berlin
leave such sh*tty jokes for your dinner. in Moscow tanks are just killers for eachother excpet pz4 and t-28, as they have no use for HE rounds so they exist often by themselves with rare shooting at infantry what makes them just boring. telling that balance is good in Berlin is to show, how stupid are you and that you understand zero about physics and damage model. 1) Berlin is worst about objects and covers as the collisions are buggy as hell, same here with remains of AAs that can stop any freakin tank. on a map where every tank often goes slower than walking infantry facepalm. 2) these covers also don’t let APs to pierce them but HE rounds fly even through trees facepalm x2. and 3) lulz is about idiotically small maps which make infantry exist on each other’s heads as well as tanks which spawn nose to nose to enemy or vise versa -on an opened parts of map at the positions which get camped easily. i wanna imagine how pz4s and t-34s will exist there meeting KTs and IS-2 face to face with their piercing lol.
We already have a TD in France and no one plays it. Yankees cry too hard about the open turret and no armor. The Hellcat can only pen the mantlet and the mg port and even a Jackson would have issues with penning the front (RNGesus).
And the Germans dont “need” a TD (they will get one anyways) as their ammo and cannons are already fine enough. I also dont know if any existing TD would have better pen values against the Jumbo.
Except that they dont work against powercreeps. If a Panzer IV already struggles with the mg port, then the cannon wont have it easier too.
What house lines? Were are those fancy house lines in Airfield and on the beaches?
Houses are not necessary a disadvantages for farming in greyzones since people tend to snipe from them in Tunisia and block paths.
Because attacker tanks on D-Day etc. usually dont live long (before they even can leave the spawns). The Germans have the high ground, (usually) better cannons/ shells and partly better armor and the surprise advantage if the Yankees are too retarded to mark camping tanks.
Moscow tansk can kill each other and both cannons and AT rifles usually have no issues dealing with them (Moscow tank dm are not broken (except maybe the BA), unlike on other campaigns). There are no real powercreeps unlike in France or to some extend in Africa. Same for Berlin. All tansk can kill each other and both the AT cannons and the Faust are reliable.
Normandy… Jumbos weakspots are unreliable, the Puma and the Stuart have weird dm and a tank which has to fear ony two tanks on med distance fights wich no one plays.
Tunisia… AB41 is the best troll tank in Gaijns entire franchise. Same about the A-13 but Axis have it easier to due to their shell type.
Sure… sure…
Its harder for tanks therefore its easier for infantry not getting stomped by camping tanks (at least most of the time). I dont know how this is a facepalm if this was my point. Berlin is a better place for inf than Brokemandy. You are even less dependet on people who have the knowlegde how to use the bloody engineer.
Wanna talk about poor designed maps? Then ask yourself why we have ballons on Airfield or why attackers hate Ver-Sur.
And thats bad for inf cause?
Kinda sucks, agree.
But you wanna talk about bugs?
How long is the FW bugged on Brokemandy? How long is the P38 bugged? How long are the Puma and the Stuart hitboxes bugged? How long do they need to deal with the Sturmpistole? How long do they need to fix the Jumbo?.. hell I can even fly through certain trees on Brokemandy and take no dmg.
This whole game is a bug festiva. Df refuses to fix bugs because they have their own weird priorities and dont even read feedback (unless its ciritic on newstuff), let alone bug report threads.
Depends. If the Germans get the P, the T34s could be able to pen it through the turret. Same for the Panzer IV.
If the same stylistics as this new event were presented, it certainly isn’t, as things get infinitely boring very quickly.
I think a whole new game of this style should be made here. But it certainly won’t be, because you would have to be a giant in the computer game market to risk your resources in this way.
Why do I think the idea of “later years” campaigns, which is very popular here at the moment, would not work either - because having 10 or more different periods of campaigns in one game requires just as much time of a huge dedicated team to manage and balance all that mass of weapons, maps, etc. Sounds nice on paper, but would hit the whole game development time this way.
I think Enlisted’s strength is precisely the stylistics of WW2, whose creation has already taken a lot of dev time. We should not toss back and forth in this way in various experiments, but focus on the fundamentals. Who made this game popular in the first place.
so we need set a game under weaklings who can’t flank a fat-nther or smash panzers without having abra…cough…pershing? jackson and hellcat would be nice solutions as most maps allow flanking. nashorn also welcome for germans
mg port
so you want lasergun piercing tank without aiming what makes it useless conserve again?
i agree Normandy needs bigger caliber cannons but holy Christ, not the devastators like A-19.
not necessary
they are, especially with such vehicles’ shitty maneuver and HE power.
tanks don’t live long
they can if flies act properly. infantry has place to go and be covered by landscape. most of times i walk there i’m untouchable for mgs. but actually this place requires usage of jumbos and hitting guns.
moscow tanks can
ends with t-28 having no AP and pz4e trying to pen t-50 in front
and still no good HE shells
puma and stuart are typical scouts and flankers, they don’t have to survive face to face if map allows and it MUST allow.
get stomped
camping tanks
engineer
poor designed maps
oh these things which don’t get me nervous in Normandy as i have place to move. and yes, engineer is introduced and improved just for those who wanna play without “depending on it”. course, its game about yankees trying to clean one cramped house rambo-style just like their propaganda told them lol.
fw
p38
oh flies which devs didn’t work through becuz pleers wanna just rush B with autorifles and change bitchpackets. then they go to forum and say flies suck.
hitboxes
again, why rework tanks if you need just sell new autopistol to counterstrike bois and see how they throw explosives at odd models which don’t even have freakin stabilisers lol. but if you ask for improvement, autopistol bois ask for not nerfing puuur eeenfontree which “suffers” from steel monsters.
but if you wan’t oneshots, it’s not wrothunder
pen through turret
sure, with such shitty stabilisation and no place to maneuver you just need to move out your resp and try to aim that heavy while he smashes you without aiming.
Yes.
For some reasons Yankees are not able/ learn to flank (may be the Jumbo). At least that was my assumption after a debate about Jackson vs. Hellcat and the way how the vast majority of the Yankees are using the Stuart. I partly agree though that many maps (especially the beach maps are not really flank-friendly). The question is still how the Jackson could be better against the Panther if its armor is still useless and still has a open turret.
No. If I penetrate the mg port, the shell should do dmg and not getting magically soaked by RNGesus or the buglord. You still would need to aim for weakspots but I am tired to either nothing happens or I magically break the gun breech of the Jumbo although I neither aimed for the turret or managed to penetrate the tank.
HE power is fine. At least on aynthing better than 37mm (20mm HE shells is unnecessary though and nerfed the Panzer II and the T-60). And actually He should work better in houses. HE works better in houses/ space-limited areas than on the open flat field.
But the vast majority of people cant fly or knows how to bomb/ rocket-attack.
Who cares about the T-28? The BT-7 and the BA are better in everything. The T-28 is a fat and slow cow and a one-way-ticket to get detpacked or OHKilled by the Panzer IV.
Use the J.
Yet their hitboxes are weird and broken. I wasnt questioning their role as flanker.
Ehm Okay… whatever.
Ehm what? The autocannon bug and the slot bug of the P38 are sth. different. It doesnt have anything to do with skill.
Again what are you talking about and why do oyu think its funny to write in retarded English?
It takes three rounds from a AT rifle to red-damage ammo. There is no OHK… at least with weak tank cannons and AT rifles. It should be rewarded if people aim for those moduels and not getting punished by RNgesus.
And why rework tanks?
Beacuse its not working as intended?
no. weaklings must study otherwise game dies earlier than it starts to improve
opened turret
no armor
it’s not heavy, son, and you don’t need to ram freakin panther facepalm.
aim at weak spots
these spots don’t show you can kill tank so fast. shells’ damage is wide topic which is bugged as hell and won’t be fixed closest 2 years, becuz majority prefers not to play tanks smartly but rush like fools. but i’ll do what i can for finishing comfort problems
dmg is fine
shells doing no damage when hit walls near infantry saing hi, and shells going through tank remains also say hello, at the end shells going through ground with no explosive damage say “goodbye” and go mining oil. with such “good” dmg explosion from pathetic packs that pierces through any armor looks like mockery
vast majority
so we need to lay a deeck on a planes and wipe them as well as tanks, am i right?
who cares
i care as you said balance is fine. time and powers there wasted for introducing this garbage to a game where speed and multitask ammo prevails above “survivability” which doesn’t exist factually, and few cannons
bitcpacked
truly right instead of using vehicle as supporter you sit at back and shiver for every human figure goes at your side
use J
in Moscow. facepalm
weird and broken
any example. as i destroy their crew for few shots. and they shouldn’t get one shot by 75mm toys. it’s not WoT
doesn’t anything to skill
it doesn’t get fixed for few days cuz vehicles are seen as odd and additional functions by players.
three rounds
again devs promised 2-shot kill of crew and modules by rifles. if doesn’t work- tab “bug reports” and topic. with such poor powers of devs they will fix nowaday bugs for years, remember it. temporary solutions don’t do good in long time perspective
cry on forum
Crying is your option. i can only laugh at how you ask about rapid fixing some bugs and don’t care about anothers
I dont know if my sentences are too complicated for you to understand or sth. like this. Another try for commies:
THE MAJORITY OF YANKEES CANT FLANK, WHICH IS WHY THEY WONT BE ABLE TO USE THE M18 PROPERLY!
I really dont know why you failed to understand that I dont share the complaints of certain Yankees about the Hellcat/ M36. If you were trying to “talk” to those Yankees, then talk to them and not with me.
Ehm No. I just tried to say that you shouldn’t expect much from CAS due to lack of skilled CAS pilots. I dont have anything against the current flying system except certain bugs.
Wait?..
Lol. Stop complaining, weakling.
Wow. Big words from someone who said…
(and I bet you also wrote complaints in the Russian subforum)
Ahhh I love those people who complain but accuse others for crying. “Lappen”, you sir are a “Lappen”.
And get me this right… Demanding bug-fixes is crying because I didnt mention other bugs too which should be fixed/ set priorities of bugs which should be fixed?
…
…
…
(And that after I agreed on your bug issues on Berlin maps).
I am sorry that I didn’t mention all bugs known in this game and/ or that I have my own priority list of bugs which should be fixed earlier tha other bugs. Its okay if you have a own priority of bugs but the staff should fix bugs which are requested by the majority of the players/ reported by us the most time (at least imo) and well… I hear more complaints about the auto cannons of the FW than about your reported bug(s) of certain Berlin obstacles (which doesn’t mean it should be fixed (as fast as possible)).
Sure, this is supertolerant madhouse what we can prove comparing mentality of any true realistic project with mentality of gaijin’s kids
THE MAJORITY OF YANKEES CANT FLANK
Then they may gtfo from game. We don’t need to baby with eqch idiot that doesn’t wan to learn. I learned and i want my skills to be rewarded instead of counting on unholy random circus
Wait
These bugs didn’t wait, they just met me in Berlin and said loud freakin HI dammit, you wanna me to repeat??
Stop to complain
I repeat after you, son
And get me this right… Demanding bug-fixes is crying because I didnt mention other bugs too which should be fixed/ set priorities of bugs which should be fixed?
I see you are one of those yanks having no ability to even flank if you don’t mention some bugs, it doesn’t mean you can ignore them
if you don’t mention some bugs, it doesn’t mean you can ignore them