Making Tank Destroyers and Glass Cannons Viable

[TheUnclaimedOne]

@tanc9101

need for BR decompression.

Or the removal of it entirely

[GeneralBrus]

Dont argue with him, it will lead to nothing.

[VoyoMayPL]

@tanc9101

Smaller profile, perhaps better survivability from the front

Imo contrary to what one may think, it’s actually a dissadvantage on many maps.
I play stug quite a lot and there is always some BS pile of rubble, small wall, pile of logs, barricade (especially stalingrad ones ) etc. that are just high enough for my little brave stug to not be able to shoot over them.

So yeah, enlisted maps being enlisted maps and turning a theoretical advantage into a dissadvantage.

[GeneralBrus]

@VoyoMayPL

(especially stalingrad ones ) etc. that are just high enough for my little brave stug to not be able to shoot over them.

Whats funny to me - the devs specifically didn’t add Jagdpanzer IV L70 into Berlin at first, because they argued that all that rubble makes it too difficult to shoot the low profile tank - even tho it means at the same time that it can’t shoot aswell.

Thankfully Jagdpanzer IV L70 A was added, which is still terrible up to this day

[GeneralBrus]

@shturmovik_rs

Title of this post is rebalancing TD’s and glass cannons. StuGs are neither.

Stugs are meant. 50mm of armor is what a glass canon is.

You are as always picking on irrelevant details in order to win an argumet that never existed to begin with.