Making Stalingrad a better place #4

[CaptainSebekel]

Hey. CRSED has a mobile version and we know if CRSED can do it, Enlisted can do it because reasons.

[gastanofrizzi]

Even crossaut

(All mama gaijin game expect enlisted for now)

[CaptainSebekel]

Whats crossout lol

[ErikaKalkbrenner]

robocraft, but cooler ( and more alive-“ish” )

( grindy as well )

[orizin2]

@ErikaKalkbrenner

ehhh stalingrad, isn’t really a place for tanks unlike tunisia. objectives are too tights and in closed quarters. resulting in possible he spam left and right
and even more dead chassy everywhere.

Certainly, Stalingrad is not a good place for tanks to operate, and the map is too narrow.
I think it would be better to add more than 20 players per team and only after the battlefield has increased by 2-3 times what it is now.

@ErikaKalkbrenner

but the 4x it’s the only reason why i and many others bought the pack.

That’s right. One of the reasons I bought the pack was because of this benefit.

[Blogaugis]

@orizin2

Certainly, Stalingrad is not a good place for tanks to operate, and the map is too narrow.
I think it would be better to add more than 20 players per team and only after the battlefield has increased by 2-3 times what it is now.

I think Berlin suffers from these issues as well.

[olek_z17]

Berlin does so even more - Stalingrad has a lot of open areas for a city map. Although the advantage of city maps is that infantry tends to concentrate in the buildings (caps, some pathways and so on), and if you have a good HE round, it’s an easy win. Or a flamethrower tank like in Stalingrad - those are really fun for clearing/defending objectives