That’s right, just like there was Pz.IV F2 in Moscow before the merge, so since this game already has so many historical inaccuracies, why not make everything possible? I don’t think this game needs to enter some “sad state” before it completely changes. Just time to look at this game with a new perspective and find some different fun, thank to the merge.
So, if I understand your argument, you are now arguing that Enlisted was inaccurate before the merge. Yet, in this thread where you are arguing that it should be made historically accurate again. This thread being one that asserts that merging campaigns is the “problem.” Was it fine before? You lost me.
I don’t think my viewpoint is that strange?
Step 1. Before merging, I opposed reducing historicity, even if it wasn’t as historically correct from the beginning. I still opposed continuing to reduce possible historicity
Step 2. I gradually accepted the environment after merge and discovered its benefits, believing that historicity is no longer as important in this game
Step 3. I saw OP and replied to the poster: “We can’t go back anymore, why don’t we expect more freedom in campaigns instead?”
This is just a casual reply, I don’t understand why I have to explain so much for a casual reply, it’s like this is an academic conference. 
You don’t have to quit yet. I for one am enjoying everything this merge has to offer excluding the fact that some desert stuff has appeared in Moscow and vice versa. I would wish that we could choose to play only a certain region of maps or there was a way to manipulate it to do so. However since the removal of the ‘preferred maps’ on equipment there hasn’t been a good way to do it yet. I can think of two things happening. Bringing back preferred maps on equipment to allow for a manipulation of the system, but if something contradicts then they cannot have both in there loadout. Or we can have an adjustment to the visual of the equipment like we do the soldiers. It’d be weird to see a grey Puma in Moscow but it’s better than having a tan Puma in Moscow right?
1 Like
Absolutely not.
Tiger 2 needs to be removed from Stalingrad (alongside BR4-5), not added to Pacific.
And I did not adapt, I quit every BR4-5 Stalingrad match till today.
1 Like
You go up a few comments and you’ll see one I made with a link to a post I made regarding making changes to a lot of the weapon BR’s and making changes to the queue system in rather one of two systems I recommended where any of the two would help keep most arsenal related timeframe organization and keep the balance I guess most people want, however I mentioned nothing about regional map organization on it as I fear people would run amok about how it would increase amounts of queues. Maybe we can brainstorm?
2 Likes
As to the OPs suggestions, I agree that Enlisted needs to correct its wrongs in regards to history, but going back to campaigns may not be the best option.
What they can do right now however:
- remove BR 4 5 from Stalingrad
- lock late war stuff like Pz IV J and MP 3008 from early war matches/replace them
- introduce adaptive generic camo for vehicles so that Stug is white in USSR, yellow in Africa and green-brown in Normandy
- link vehicles to preferred theaters, e.g. lineups with LVT and Seagull would more frequently go to Pacific and lineups with Crusader and A13 - to Tunisia.
5 Likes
Because that caused botfarming to make certain campaigns outright unplayable, whether it being one side boring due to fighting bots all the time, or the other frustrating because you never actually manage to win a game. Tunisia Axis and Berlin Allies were the worst offenders pre-merge.
Being no longer able to choose campaigns was a necessary sacrifice to make the game more tolerable.
1 Like
Not enough so who cares?
And even other pop wasnt populated enough for most campaigns.
Not really.
Tunisia was Allies lol-cowing 95% of the time. Or Berlin switched from 50% Soviets botfarms to German 50% lolcowing the rest of the time.
These changes happened on a monthly basis.
Not really according to stats.
Orherwise the numbers would be worse.
As they tried in HnG and it did not work.
Because it sucked and was doomed.
The flavour of Zombie weapons and tanks that were not there?
And I dont stand those masses of T-50s while only one was maybe around Moscow for one recon mission and those masses of F2 that were not built by that time.
Good idea to make sure that people cant play Normandy for most part because they dont own the good stuff and get queued against Tigers agaib because that was fun.
So we have map queues AND BR queues.
How many queues do you want? 50?
No. Its stupid.
Is stupid beyond first point so no thanks.
Make Enlisted “historically accurate" again
Never was.
Not even on release.