Seems petty on the surface but 95% of br5 players who are experienced are guilty of it. However it feels better winning against opponents with organized squads or preaching a lesson to players who unlock their first br5 gun or vehicle and to just hold off on using br5 gear until you get enough of that gear to organize whole squads
Slow Game???
._.
Average Game is 10-20 minutes
And compared to HLL ands squad which average Game is 1 hour…
https://steamdb.info/app/2767030/charts/
i am talking about big streaming games
Overwatch 2, Marvel Rivals, PUBG, Fortnite, APEX
not other small games
if you are playing 10 minute enlisted games you are playing it wrong a proper enlisted game should last 25-30 minutes
my statement enlisted is bad for streaming prove me wrong show me a big influencer on any site streaming enlisted.
bug hundreds of thousands of subscribers countless views or watchers ect 300k 600k 900k
Me and my group of friends get games done in 5-7 minutes numerous times though. Moral of the story most of those matches that are done in under 10 minutes involve at least a coordinated trio to a 4 stack.
because bots are stupid a single br5 weapon can decimate a squad of br3 weapons
a br5 tank can decimate br4 br3 tanks especially if that tank is a tiger 2 and the enemy are American.
i am sure the enemy team you fought were having loads of fun.
Exactly
That sums up both reasons on why br 3-4 should be a thing. 3 stands a better chance against 4 than it does against 5 bc of that guns and vehicles are on br 5
Yeah no im assured they weren’t lol
absolutely not, BR III and BR IV are more aligned while BR V sits atop a mountain
M1 Garand → Johnson Rifle → T20/M2 carbine
G41 → G43 → FG42
type otsu → type 4 garand → type hei automatic rifle
Please offer your reasoning as to why it is ever fair for a semi automatic tier such as BR3 or BR4 should fight the fully automatic tier of BR5
1 Like
Not to mention the bar at br3 is better than the Johnson lmg at br4
Literally the same gun except the g43 uses mags
The biggest difference is on japan but it only involves a 3 round increase
And don’t forget Russia’s t3 svt38 and t4 svt40. Quite literally the same gun
I think BR III is THE world war 2 BR. Maybe for Japan it’s BR II but for everyone else it’s BR III.
BR 4 is starved for content that even if an MM bracket is introduced for it, it it unlikely that people would play it at all.
BR 3 and 4 equipment are generally close enough in performance that it doesn’t feel unfair fighting each other.
The gap between BR 4 and 5 is a a deep chasm.
it is a 5 round increase btw
The person I replied to suggested BR 1-2, BR3, and BR 4-5
No one plays BR4 because your more then likely playing BR5. Hell, I can’t play BR3 with my Allies and if I draw the Japanese, I almost guarantee it is BR5 Japanese.
Thought the jap garand had 8
Agreed. DF doesn’t have to make every level it’s own BR level, but it seriously needs to shit can level 5 from being included in any level 3 and 4 game. Not that I haven’t pointed this out, but I would do level 1-2, level 3-4 and leave level 5 ALONE. So in my world, level 2 would NEVER face level 3 and level 4 would never face level 5.
I would incorporate a couple level 4 weapons into my level 3-4 squads, which I don’t now because I am trying to keep my level 3 out of level 5 games, which when I decide to play my level 3 allies get screwed into a lot of level 5 Japanese games, so I just desert. DF could do us all a favor if they just for once LISTENED to their players.
Same I’d mix some br4 assaulters and machine gunners with riflemen and engineers with bolt actions tbh.
1 Like
I would rather have…
BR1
BR2
BR3
…than this:
Just balance things towards the queues. Not towards BRs, which can cause your entire lineup to be artificially undervalued depending on MM RNG.
What’s fun about having BR4 lineup in BR4-BR5 match. I just want fairness, that’s all.