| US | China | Japan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| “should” appear in: | A little | Yes | No |
| really appear in: | Yes | Maybe | No |
| Produced in: | Yes | No | No |
Literally just because you have said so. 
No other reason needed, lol.
So does Enlisted+ mil sim
Which they never mentioned once in their entire existence.
1 Like
It is planed and actually conducts test production in US.
Some of the product is tested in Springfield, and there’s now left 3 actual gun in US.
The soldiers unsurprisingly did not carry any identifications (intendedly removed I shall say). It will be just some random selected unit with no relation to their weapons and presences at all.
1 Like
in all honesty,
i have no idea what you are trying to communicate here.
but i should clarify,
enlisted did in the past, self advertised as historical accurate.
but from the very first alpha test which i took part of, and few others such as CaptainSebekel can tell you that this game was bugger all but " historical accurate ".
and yes. enlisted is not totally arcady.
but as " settings " go past the merge, it kinda is.
( which it was necessary for it’s survival. despite veekay would like to make you believe )
i’m kinda one of those fools who have fallen for the initial advertisement which it’s very different from the current one found on the site.
and i’m someone who sticks around to provide some of that historical accuracy back through mods.
( albe it, PVEs ) exactly what chants veekay. but i don’t see him doing what he advises the developers to do.
fun fact, if you take a look at this loadouts, those are not historical accurate either.
so he doesn’t believe in what he chants for either.
i, on the hand, share his same ideals but for customs.
because in the base game, it will never work.
i guess you have a point.
but still.
i can’t really feel simpathy for errors that i’m fairly certain would be easier to fix as well.
as it goes for the squads them selves and to be on topic, i still stand that others squads should get same benefits. and not only 1 or few ( as in, future squads )
like, how do you expect to go forward if you ( as in the company ) lacks modularity for future changes and what not.
I think this discussion is pointless. It’s all about personal preferences.
If you are okay with Chinese soldiers in Europe and Africa. I understand you are not going to have issues with it.
I find it lame and unnecessary.
Of course, since the developers have gone to the trouble of adding it, I’m certainly not going to yell at them not to add it to the game.
It’s more just frustrating the direction they’re taking. And your reactions just made me irrationally triggered for whatever reason (probably from lack of sleep).
1 Like
Simply wonderful! All the prizes are very good and we also received interesting historical information! 
Low-key wish there was at least one of the new rifles as a captured gun for Japan. But my envy aside they look really cool and so does the rifle along with the portrait and name decorator 
(still got nothing on the dragon though 
)
3 Likes
Well we have other weapons that we don’t have physically preserved some even in the tech tree
2 Likes
Same way we have Moroccans in the Pacific DF should implement preferable maps so people can have build for specific map same way now i wanna have my Chinese build for Burma campaign hope they even put Chinese uniforms for US soldiers and option to change their voice line and if they give me the ability to play only this campaign amazing
1 Like
Meh another rifleman squad to collect dust. Does the data says its what the masses use the most? Cause i get cheapskate vibes….
ALSO INNOVATION WHEN?!
complete punctuation and capital letters may make my words sound too serious
i suppose the “so does” here means search results since it is expected that every Enlisted veterans knew that the game self advertised as historical accurate, ErikaKalkbrenner considered it should be “once/in the past”
and if you really searched “Enlisted mil sim”, this is the first result
Would nice if you could do that separately to only one specific customization preset (Pacific in this case) and for all other campaigns soldiers would still be US.
1 Like
Overall, nice squad and the rifle, cool portrait, and cute nickname decorator. Though, I just hope Japan will get more main event content than the last year. Recent stand-alone event squad was USA’s French guerrilla, and now this, a squad for USA again… I’m kinda tired of USA getting many stuff than others lately since the Burma patch, balance your content pls.
5 Likes
Yeah will be nice if all campaign have unique customizations Bruma to be separated from the normal pacific and have its unique Chinese customizations only there.
1 Like
I’M SO EXCITED FOR THIS!! I AM AGRESSIVELY SHITTING ALL OVER MY WORK DESK RN!!!
LET A HUNDRED FLOWERS BLOOM!!!
4 Likes
Idk. Making it serious would make more sense than cringe.
Too high expectations apparently.
I agree that solving game bugs, balancing, and other issues is more important than historical accuracy, if I understand your words correctly.
But no, those false advertisements still exised today even in stores (DF only edited their main page) and everyday there are new players coming and thinking this is a mil-sim. It is equally irresponsible to say “Enlisted self-advertised as mil-sim but it’s actually not. You are fooled.”
Nice,looks like a fun squad.I hope the next Chinese squad is Japanese collaborators at some point,but knowing China someone is going to whine about it.
3 Likes