Lunar New Year

The trouble is seeing squads in battlefields they do not belong on, imagine seeing Japanese soldiers defending Berlin. Russian troops fighting Japanese in Iowa Jima it be immersion breaking. Or hell take to to the extreme and add battle that never happened like operation sea lion. Now people who do not want china as a faction have a point people who did not want Chinese squads should grow up. Many countries fought in WW2 in luding the Philippines and France.

1 Like

I fully agree with your point. We’re currently under a very thin line between adding interesting squads and breaking immersion. Lastly what you said is what I was referring. There were just so many smaller countries involved in both sides. Many had their armies split up between supporting both sides at the same time, giving result to civil war clashes, etc. But yes, the list for adding smaller nations in the form of event squads in the future, is quite broad and there’s lots of potential content we could have. I feel like we just need to be a bit more open-minded.

I was also initially drawn to Enlisted’s then attempt at historical accuracy, despite some obvious compromises here and there, yet I’ve welcomed many of these recent additions. Like the French partisans and this Chinese squad. Because I want to see this game thrive with new content, and attracting more new players along the way.

2 Likes

Stop adding ‘foreign’ stuff until it has its own techtree.
Also stop adding that stuff until there is some sort of map selection.

Now we’re gonna have French squads in the Pacific and Chinese squads in Tunisia.
Totally ridiculous.

6 Likes

if uk/italy cant get a tech tree how would france china get a tech tree
so you are saying don’t add anything but japan, soviet, allies, axis
don’t talk

1 Like

It’s not “LUNAR” new year
It’s definitely Chinese New Year.
I’m sure a lot of East Asian players in the community group are saying that it’s not just you Chinese celebrating THE NEW YEAR.
We don’t want only Chinese people to celebrate Chinese New Year, just like Christmas, and I’m just as likely to celebrate the arrival of Christmas as Westerners.
We never said that only the Chinese could celebrate Chinese New Year.
In fact, We really blieve in ‘about celebrating together as one’, ‘sharing joy with the world’
But what we can’t accept it when people are clearly celebrating Chinese New Year on that day 01.29.2025 but then try to take the ‘CHINESE’ out of it.
Maybe some smartass saying : “We should all be more inclusive.”
I didn’t force somebody to say ‘Chinese New Year,’ and I don’t have the power. but this isn’t about inclusive.
If you try saying’ Lunar New Year’ tries to erase our cultural roots, and as Chinese people, we need to protect our culture.
And, Chinese New Year falls on a different date in every year, which brings us back to ‘Lunar’.
The Gregorian calendar is based on the Earth’s orbit around the sun, while the lunar calendar it based on the moon’s orbit around the Earth
Chinese New Year it based on a combined solar and lunar calendar, which takes into account the 24 solar terms(Chinese Ancestral Command), leap months, and the lunar cycle to determine the date.
So you can see, using ‘lunar New Year’ alone it incorrect and disrespctful to our cultural root.
If we let Luanr be the reference, the first new moon of 2025 should be at 01:27 GMT on January 1, 2025, and people who call the Chinese New Year of January 29, 2025 Lunar New Year should celebrate their New Year on January 1.
Although as a Chinese, We still celebrate Christmas, and that’s totally fine.
BUT WE CAN’T JUST CALL IT ‘CHINESE CHRISTMAS’.
That’s not about cultural tolerance.
That’s about stealing and appropriating someone else’s culture.

The Spring Festival, AKA. Chinese New year, has successfully been added to the World Heritage list in 2024.
I hope everyone celebrating Chinese New Year had a great day.

1 Like

Or let the foreign aspect of the squad be available only in campaigns it belongs to.

With upcoming option to change nationalities of soldiers it should be quite easy. Especially if you could change nationality of soldiers for each customization preset separately.


But you are quite right. They should stop adding stuff like this until they figure out scenarios such as “Chinese in Tunisia”.

It just shouldn’t be possible. And it’s annoying that devs are completely ignoring this issue.

6 Likes

At present, the event has the Japanese infantry first, and then the current Chinese infantry, and then the German infantry or the Soviet infantry?

not saying you are wrong,

but there are few things to consider:

  • most people genually do not care.

mostly because one can rebutt with:

  • " how really different is it with germans using volkssturm / insert other nation of weapons that they get access to* being in tunisia ? "

or any campaign for that matter with any other equipment.
it’s rather late to fix the said inconsistent issues.

enlisted is more like those 2 am history channels of " alternative history " lmao

1 Like


If it were Germany, I would recommend her to be in the German infantry team at the event, so that the Toggle lock party would be attended not only by the United States and Japan, but also by Germany, and I prefer this design of the series of weapons

ć±ćč•æˆȘć›Ÿ 2025-02-03 222854
ć±ćč•æˆȘć›Ÿ 2025-02-03 222914
ć±ćč•æˆȘć›Ÿ 2025-02-03 222937
ć±ćč•æˆȘć›Ÿ 2025-02-03 223015

Well, it should be automatic. (Default nationality for each tech tree should be german, american, japanese and Russian.)
And this nationality could be changed in specific campaigns presets where it thematically makes sense to some other nationality (thus only people who cares would have more unique soldiers. And main nationalities would always be prevalent. Since as you have said, majority of people doesn’t care about stuff like that).

Of course, if there’s special squad like this Chinese one. Or legacy squads from back then. Their default nationality in campaign where it makes sense should be the unique foreign one the squad is based around.

And people simply shouldn’t be allowed to pick nationality of soldiers that doesn’t fit to specific campaign.

Well, you shouldn’t be able to use volksturmm customization in Tunisia just like you shouldn’t be able to use Chinese customization in Tunisia.

In the matter of weapons, that’s already lost cause unrelated to customization aspects I am talking about.

BR level of weapons doesn’t even mimic the “the higher BR, the later in war” idea anyway.

2 Likes

This shouldn’t be the benchmark to strive towards though.

Those who don’t care/know WW2 won’t understand what’s going on anyway, and those who are passionate about WW2 would appreciate the attention to the topic.

2 Likes

that’s the thing though.

devs don’t put many details into HA at all because not many people would notice either way. nor they even try. like, look at the HW squads. the hori productions, the 3 burst fed, etc etc. nor actually put alot of effort into what you would like. which would imply rewoking half if not more the whole content.
which it’s just not going to happen.

and, their prime customers are those who just want more daka / stronger things regardless if are remotely historical or not. actually, i would go even further and say shiny different things as long are " unique " which goes against the very nature of ww2 ( that is, for equipment ).

the only ones who tried to care are the cosmetic team department.
i can’t commend enough most of their work ( granted, most are censored. but still )

Tbh, it feels like they are the ones who care about the least.

1 Like

mhh


i can see why.

can’t bs anyone saying that are 101 reproduction.

but for example, the US paratrooper, the zelthbahns ( on premies ) knochensacks ( german paras camo tunics ), the tan japanese uniforms from that premium tank squad, aussies, sas squad, the mp40 silenced, most german camouflage and basic tunics, the soviet amebas and some others are actually great, nearly spot on.

granted, some of them are hard to mess up.
but for the most part, looks good.

with that being said, the HW squads did produced some abominations.
but after all, it was most likely a comission.

you can’t say no to your boss around here.

2 Likes

Really good post, nuanced, well worded and argued. More people should argue like this

1 Like

Ha! I appreciate that, bro. English is not my first language, but I do like trying to get my point across, however I can. Salute!

1 Like

Yet for some reason, USSR still doesn’t get to fight in Normandy and USA still doesn’t fight in Berlin. I wonder what could be the reason. Maybe it IS the historical accuracy after all? The last bits of it, at least.

Pushing this Chinese squad into the game is just such an inconsistent and out of place decision.

4 Likes

So the avatar appears to have the same uniform as the squad. But why didn’t the squad get the red collar insignias which the avatar has?

That’s so half-baked it appears intentional. But what is the reasoning not to create those uniforms the proper way?

1 Like

It is you who were replying that “Enlisted never mentioned ‘Enlisted + mil sim’ once in their entire existence” to a “Searching ‘enlisted’ + ‘arcade’ only have results to this forum” post, and your proof here was just showing another game appeared to be more realistic (not even milsim) than Enlisted. This is a false and failed support as it has no relation to your reply, my post, and the original topic. When it comes to game’s identity, what you did was just showing a YT Shorts (they don’t even have descriptions) intended for propaganda. If you recognize them then so (more) do those sponsored videos and ads.

Now you were even confusing the topic from milsim to realistic. And I don’t know which game is the industry standard of realistic for you, PUBG or Fortnite? You can prove Enlisted is milsim and realistic by comparing with them anyway.

“Its YT description”.

If you are not going to refer this as milsim then you may need to explain your novel definition about it.

Even the start of this dialogue was just claiming that “Enlisted was once self-advertised as historical accurate, but not now”, and what you were saying was Enlisted never did this (again, I don’t know what you are really intended to reply) in their entire existence. I have no idea if I should expect you have ever read the text in Enlisted’s main page, like

QQć›Ÿç‰‡20250205083020

which kept by Darkflow (and Gaijin) until now in multiple obvious positions.

One thing I remebered clearly about Rising Storm 2 is when you step on the very edge of flame caused by Molotov, you immediately burnt to death as if your whole body is wrapped in white phosphorus.

What this point mean to the conversation?

1 Like

For the equality. (joking

1 Like