It was in this particular context, but that’s besides the point now.
Ah ok, so in this particular case, you need to get out to fix it, and in order to fix the barrel you need to be up front where you can get targeted by the tank that damaged the barrel in the first place.
History is only good if it fits in pwn agenda I guess.
Nah you just replied out of context and I don’t want to derail the thread any further.
Pfff Sure… whats more out of context than mentioning real life stuff that is not ingame.
Actually I have more issue playing BR5 german and seeing my fking team with Pz II C and Pz III J while still using the Mauser Bolties, in fking BR5, I refuse to believe the Devs “fixed” their BR system in the last patchnote
2 Likes
The bits you didn’t read, but keep going
they probably bring a single BR5 weapon.
i know i got thrown into a BR4 match because i want to try the funny rocket shotgun.
How the hell they bring single BR5 weapons when they literally have Pz II C/Pz III J, full squad with Mauser and MP28?
Enlight me. Should be less stupid than telling people to shoot at barrels of Tigers and call it gg.
1 Like
Wow, this thread really reminds me from a conversation about T34 appearing in Moscow, or T50 vs PzE, or when Jumbo came up on Normandy.
I think we should, as a community, go back to those threads and dig up what advice were given.
Lets go and find:
- “historical accuracy justificies all imbalances”
- git gut
- just flank it bro
Wow! It looks like Allies have found these solutions earlier, and now we just have to implement them here.
Thank goodness.
Oh, ass-ymmetrical balance too, a sprinkle on the cup cake.
2 Likes
So you say, pooh.
But it’s all factions that do this, and due to a dumb flaw of the game:
- Nobody likes being minus 2 br tier in a match.
So, don’t blame the faction you don’t play, blame the flawed game design.
Talking about “honour or competitive spirit”, what kind can be found into fighting -2 tiers, either as tier 5 or tier 3? You have some strange definition of it…
4 Likes
And?
That is why I point it towards the enemy and pray to cod it’s correct
3 Likes
On a serious note, the M2 Carbines really really deserve a change to their sight picture - its supposed to fit well into BR5, and there is no balance argument for it having bad sights.
2 Likes
Ehh What? I dont care about whose faction tells me to lol flanking his driving God tank. Those can all go to hell and so probably 75% of the people here think the same depending on the week.
The ranks of the Fix Gun Sights Coalition increased.
Welcome comrade.
2 Likes
I have made some comments before about how the FG42 has better sights over the FG42 II and how this makes it easier to use the first FG in single fire mode, while the second has much easier to control recoil in full auto. So to speak are the rather “bad” sights on the FG42 II no real problem for the weapon if used in full auto.
The M2 Carbine however has much worse sights, and since you need multiple rounds to kill your target, you need to be able to stay on target during your bursts - which is the problem - once you start firing you completely lose your sight picture.
Its just very bad for no reason, the M2 doesn’t even have insane performance to begin with, so why this limitation?
1 Like
The Winchester M95, Carbine M1A1, Garand, T20, and even the M1 Carbine as well.
I think they just hate America.
2 Likes