Because it’s not historically accurate and airports have proven to be poor mechanisms.
One single big bomb is useless. Id rather have 2×250kg ams 4×60kg
Most of 2x250kg drops in the game are completely useless, they drop glued together and do absolutely nothing more than a single 250 kg would, which is beyond stupid and the devs refuse to fix it or even acknowledge it. No one is asking for 6 individual drops from the 188, but why do bomb equipped 110s, 410s, the Japanese no-forward-gun-bomber drop them together? If you look at a replay they are fused together. Its completely brain-dead
1 Like
You can say the same thing about any twin engine attacker. Im sorry but this is a useless statement to make. And it does not refute my argument that the Ju188 is a very unique bomber that has basically no parrallel.
The closest thing to the Ju188 for Japan would be the P1Y. And even then the defensive armament is not even close.
The G4M only carries 4x250kg, 1×500kg or 800kg, its slower, clumsier and worse protected that Ju188
The Ki-67 only carries either 8×100kg, 3×250kg, 1×500kg or 800kg. And its still slower, clumsier and worse protected. So its a shitty choice for a high BR plane any way.
No theres two 800kg bombs for Japan in WT, one is the AP the other is a conventional bomb.
This is a seperate issue that needs to be fixed. It bothers the hell out of me and robs certain aircraft from being effective.
Anything that goes into BR2 and is somewhat fast and with at least a single bomb strong enough to blow up 105 Shermans
I may or may not have been recently re-traumatised by an all-you-can-eat 105 buffet in Pacific recently.
OP literally said this is for br3, so I don’t really see your problem.
1 Like
Adding a shitty bomber is not make you not suck.
It would help a lot if I didnt have to waste 5 minutes having to take off from the carrier while my team bleeds like 200 tickets due to a grayzone 105
1 Like
There are better options than the G4M or Ki-67.