So in theory GE op armaguerra gets 6kills / clip and murrican gets 7 / mag
quite sure there was / is ussr vs anime event going on, so the “need” or “idea” for these buffs came from somewhere.
Also obviously anime fights murricans as well.
While GE also fights them both and still gets the short end of the stick
Someone haven’t read my post with a good reading compression. I’m just tired of unfair treatment of Germany as all other nations gets new toys and massive buffs while they are rot to die and be extremely weak. I had to fight with gaijin to finally buff M38/42 but it’s not enough to keep up as it’s stats besides of rof were not updated and are straight up bad.
Why does Japan can have BR3 smg power at BR1 while Germany has to play with smgs worse than even the first BR smgs? What bout BR2 where they get dominated by Sov/USA every single match? At least PPSh-41 box got finally fixed so it’s something but that smg is still much better than anything Germany has unless you are a veteran with multiple MP-41
No because it takes twice as long to get a kill for the m1, the armag shoots once kills the American before he can fire a. Second Tim. If the m1 shot twice as fast as the armag you would have a point.
as much as I agree with that the 9mm round with its 0.2 more dmg is OP as fk.
therefor id rather nominate very little known m-22 ( predecessor of kp-26 )
Its chambered for 7.63?x25 mauser.
So it has the same extremely poor dmg as soviet weapons.
But theres a catch, it also comes with extremely bad rof estimated 900 - 1100
which is somewhere around 0.2 seconds ? Pretty sure people who has such reaction time aint wasting time on enlisted.
ok m1 shoots first fails to down the enemy is shot dies or is downed
most people at br1 2 dont have there perks maxed for most people the m1 takes 2 shots to the amargs 1
Or the memeguerra user kills 6 from 9 man squad and while doing the ~3-4s reload M1 crybine kills 7 of the said squad and actually still have time to reload and kill the rest.
We can make these assumptions rest of the day.
Its proven that ~2mm thick soviet bodyarmor was capable to stop direct hit of 88 flak !!!1
how dead men dont get to make kills, the m1 carbine would have to get hits, get hits twice as fast. that means either the armag is missing shots or nerfing there own rof. lets say 9 riflemen both sides only hitting one in four shots. axis takes 2 allies first round allies give two wounds or one kill. each round is one shot so axis still have 5 shots per gun. round 2 8 vs 7 axis kills 2 allies one leaving 7 to 5. and you can see where this is going.
its 7.1 damage vs 11.2 what do you want a small nerf to the m1 or a small buff to the armag to ensure the 2 vs one shot body kill
i forgot german mains cant aim, so if they are hitting half the shots that would make the m1 carbine supperior.
Quite rarely ive seen 2 squads to lineup in 1800’s manner in lines with honor to duel with theyr rifles to death.
So, as bots are good as bucket of sht what comes to shooting im referring to memeguerra player could kill 6 and in return m1 takes 7.
Nope, M1 is fine as it is and actually imo best SA of low br.
And what comes to memegerra unless it gets the soviet 15.6? treatment its quite useless piece of sht.
Having bits with shit aim favors the amarg player as a human player has to land twice the shots
And a single player with a five shot bolty can wipe an m1 squad what is your point you can’t just make up numbers without explaining them
No the amarg is not going from 11 to 15 damage unless the m1 carbine is buffed to 10
So, the early Type 100 smg gets boosted to a base of 700, but the Dev’s can’t do a f**king thing to the FNAB, even though people have been asking for it? I am fine if were going to buff a weapon, but who has been on the forum asking for a Type 100 super buff? The FNAB basically “WAS” in the same ballpark as the Type 100 with it’s rate of fire, now it basically is completely obsolete, so either buff the damn thing, or drop it to level one where it is still outclassed, but at least serviceable.
Dev’s, your responsible for this clusterfuk as you should have just created ALL the weapons to the “TRUE STATISTICS” from the very beginning, and people wouldn’t be whining all the time to buff this and de buff that. You screwed this pooch by your poor management decisions. Just sayin… Had you just given every weapon it’s true statistics, whether they were good or bad, then all you had to say when people bitched was "take it up with the gun manufacture.
Mauser C96 - Wikipedia 20 round semi-auto 9mm prototype M1917 trench carbine. br1 german rifle option
Dev’s, your responsible for this clusterfuk as you should have just created ALL the weapons to the “TRUE STATISTICS” from the very beginning, and people wouldn’t be whining all the time to buff this and de buff that. You screwed this pooch by your poor management decisions. Just sayin… Had you just given every weapon it’s true statistics, whether they were good or bad, then all you had to say when people bitched was "take it up with the gun manufacture.
a lot guns would have to go to a higher br
as for the FNAB period sources not a Frankenstein recreation