Japan - Defeated 90% of Matches, so it seems :(

Suggestions
21

QQ_1720964376807

I played in the Japanese camp for a while, so I have a lot of complaints.
This game is biased against the Japanese camp, or their slow pace of improvement makes people suspect bias.
This is not a problem of weapon strength or player skill differences.
It is more serious. Japan is not on the same equal playing field as other camps.
The low BR Japanese camp has no aircraft that can be deployed in the air. All aircraft must take off from aircraft carriers. This is very unfair.
The Japanese tank machine guns are very poor. Their machine guns need to be specially arranged for a tank crew to operate, but you cannot command the machine gun to fire when you are controlling the gunner, and the machine gunner has a higher priority than the loader, causing your tank to fall into the DEBUFF without a loader after losing a crew member.
But similar tanks such as M2A4 and T28 do not have these penalties. Their machine guns are still effective. For example, in M2A4, even if you only have one tank crew left, you can still operate three tank machine guns and a tank gun at the same time, but the Japanese camp cannot.
This is not an interesting feature. This is an unfair distinction.
In addition, the anti-tank weapons of the Japanese camp are also very poor. I know type97 ATgun performs well, but it does not make up for the overall shortcomings

Japanese tanks are very bad, and their BR is also abnormal. CHI-NU is not as good as Sherman tanks but is at BR3, while CHI-TO is almost the same as Sherman tanks but is at BR4. As for CHI-NU KAI, it is completely non-existent. BR1~BR3 cannot compete with Sherman tanks, especially Sherman 105 tanks

Even if there are a few excellent tank players driving tanks to defeat these Sherman tanks, the US military can immediately deploy P51D or P38 to quickly eliminate this tank player, and the Japanese camp has a low BR because there is no air deployment of aircraft and can only hope to defeat the enemy in tank confrontation

I can win when playing the Japanese camp, but this does not mean that these problems do not exist

2 Likes
22

I don’t agree with this because this is a fictitious ideal environment.
Yes, a BR2 veteran can beat a BR3 novice.
But what about BR2 novices? Should they not play the game?
What if a BR2 veteran meets a BR3 veteran?

23

equipment doesnt play big difference between players. it is skill difference that plays all the difference. if 2 players have same skill level, BR3 player will have slight advantage, but nothing game breaking like if they were against BR2 veteran.

24

I mean flu is still the flu but better than cancer.

25

OK, then I think we should weaken the US advantage and let the US camp experience the feeling of using skills to make up for the difference in weapons.

26

but it kinda happens right now cause US faction is stacked with veterans. ffs 3-4 months ago situation was exactly opposite despite japan having exactly the same weapons as they have now.

27

Well explained, thank you.