IS-2 (1944) clearly had modifications to additional armor, but where did the track boards go?

Suggestions
12

Yeah and G-14 is missing its bombs Axis planes have less bomb then allies all the time are given some strange payloads I willing to give the Soviets IS-3 if I can get second bomb for the Jabo and bombs for premium and normal G-14 and attacker plane with rockets and bombs …

13

the plate is angled

Screenshot (235)
Screenshot (235)1920×1080 2.29 MB

here is not angled armour to compare:
Screenshot (236)
Screenshot (236)1920×1080 2.45 MB

2 Likes
14

pandora´s box to E-100 and Jagdtiger.
Its actually Axis mains that should be begging for IS-3 because they will win far more with that.

5 Likes
15

I’m absolutely against doom turtles but if its gonna give me good payloads cuz thats the thing I hate about Axis planes lack of bombs this G-14 should be having its bomb …

1 Like
16

image
image1553×304 51.4 KB

30 degree of angle doesn’t ricochet, so it have nothing to do with shell normalization

1 Like
17

bf-109 K-4 was fixed after we asked for it so a few suggestions would help.

1 Like
18

Doest have to, its impact angle is still worse after shell normalization thus decreasing effective armour.
I really dont care, go ahead and nerf IS-2 for that 15mm more armour with massive effective armour loss, but I warned you guys.

2 Likes
19

Buff jdpz IV! remove tracks!
image
:melting_face:

1 Like
20

tracks are copium, they only help stopping HEATs so bazooka, panzerfaust, PIAT, but against AP shells they are useless.

1 Like
21

and don’t forget the PPSh-41 with box magazine which the DEVs ignore to fix over months / years

22

Years actually :shushing_face:

1 Like
23

If you’re struggling to kill any variation of a Pz 4 it’s a you problem… especially when we have full ammo and you have apc now.

24

You know, the 80mm frontal armor and track plates can withstand 95% of Allied tank guns at BR 3. It’s on par with the STZ but with a better main gun.

25

which-t34-is-the-best-at-br3-v0-ypt5l6zsqsve1
which-t34-is-the-best-at-br3-v0-ypt5l6zsqsve13840×2160 628 KB

26

Funny how axis tanker are often expected to aim for some wierd turret weakspots but meanwhile the allies/ USSR players are cronicly unable to aim for a turret 10 times the size…

1 Like
27

even without trucks, he perfectly holds the beer of German tankers)
But I suppose if they do… the German cattle will squeal)

28

that tank is pointless even with the tracks

29

Stop talking nonsense,everyone knows what this means.

tiger1
tiger11317×934 2.27 MB

tiger2
tiger21239×849 1.88 MB

1 Like
30

Oh, that’s a thing in Enlisted too? Nice if true.

Let the Tankies nerf themselves if they want to, you tried warning them.

1 Like
31

its in WT for sure, I experimented with it a little and the effect is not too dangerous since you lose only a few degrees so I would say that it depends on its armour thickness and slop whether or not its worth putting tracks on as armour.
In the case of IS-2, that 15mm will have no effect whatsoever, but it does decrease the chance to ricochet while you probably lose that 15mm armour in effectiveness too :melting_face:

1 Like