Infantry main players are the real cancer

not building rallys, leaning out in the open, camping an enemy spawn point and not defending while the smarter enemies flank around the tryhard and capture the point…

2 Likes

This is fucking art.

If your teammates not doing the work, then you should do the work in order to win (unless you don’t). Flying in sky all the time and shit is simply a way to lose. Esp when you need people to mark for you.
Oh yes, there might be another possibility that you simply cant kill that much by playing infantry…
My advice is kamikaze and rush the point with your infantry. Or get some teammates.

Ya I know but thers like 2 on every map except for Normandy with the 109 G 10

It’s not infantry mains that are „the“ problem. It’s players who are useless to their team.

Because they don’t build rally points, because they just camp (as snipers) on a demolition map where they should attack or because they are almost useless in their plane and could contribute much more if they would grab an infantry squad and would at least participate in the charge/defense.

That being said a game should always be fun to its players. So if anyone gets fun out of playing sniper or flying a plane - despite not being very good - it shouldn’t be a problem. But unfortunately winning is rather important in this grind-based game so they become a problem to everyone else who wants his team to win. It’s the one toxic factor of this game that makes everyone else salty over time.

If everyone is playing the game “wrong”, there’s something wrong with the game. Or, in this particular case, there’s A LOT wrong with the game. It looks like developers don’t have the slightest idea of what their playerbase wants, or why they even play the game.

You can blame the players for playing “wrong”, it is their choice to do that after all, but they are not the root cause of the problem.

2 Likes

80% of players using nothing but basic shooty guns all the time and not touching specialized equipment isn’t something that’s unique to Enlisted, it’s just brainlets being inherent to the genre.

2 Likes

From my experience, Enlisted is way outside the norm in terms of the number of players completely refusing to play the way developers intended. I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything on this level, which is only made worse by bots intentionally posing as players. “Brainlets” nonwithstanding, it’s a sign of serious game design issues.

1 Like

actually contrary to popular belief all thats needed from infantry players is for them to attack the point. my mate and i have won countless matches against sweats while on attack without a rally point using just bolt action squads. alot of the time a good attack team can take the point first try if everyones aggressive and doesnt setup camp with rallies

The problem might also be that we can’t really differ real players from bots. So people can get worked up over people that aren’t even real.

And let’s be honest: the real problem is games being decedided in the first 5 minutes because people just bail out at the first sight of trouble. Every low-performing noob is marginal compared to it.

like I said, it’s not just an Enlisted thing.
Look at any other casual or semi-casual FPS with mixed units, especially free-to-play ones. In all of them you see the same things happening, like nobody making even an attempt to crack a tank.

The other big isue is pushing up the grey area so close to the objective defence has to go hunting out of bounds to find them and end up dieing

I remember, thats the Panther Guy…

I dont get it until today…

Why did someone get offended when in a WW2 Game/Movie,
which he decide to play,
are WW2 things.

Theres no nice Smiley… :point_right: :boom: :exploding_head: