Not necessarily
Well, if you would have read it, rn his suggestion would allow BR3 SU to always face BR3 and lower but no BR4 and that would also affect “normal” players who in return would either suffer, choose different BRs/ factions or do the same.
Also not helped that these ranges are matter of harsh subjective terminology which could result in worse stuff like that.
1 Like
I guess this is true, but lower BRs getting into higher BR matches isn’t an issue, this this specifically could be adjusted then.
1 Like
When comes to weapons, Tools, and vehicle i say yes to their detailed accuracy but for Maps Why Not Loosen up A Bit, this will choke the game creativity.
Im also interested of Reviving the heroes and generals objective game design in enlisted.
I want to see what kind of gameplay we gonna get if we change the Enlisted conquest Gamr Mode to heroes and generals Assault game mode
Is this even an argument considering that Japanese BR3 only fights against BR3 and lower already?
Also it’s not something that cannot be changed by slightly adjusting the map spread.
I like the concept of the suggestion, maybe the actual result need to be adjusted. The fact that we don’t have 100% HA doesnot mean that we should have 0%. And I don’t see why people who don’t care about HA shoulf be pleased while people who care should be ignored.
1 Like
Yes because both cases suck and should not exist.
And as a side note, going full Wehraboo, Soviets are worse since they dont have paper tanks but BR3 launchers and heavy(ier) tanks. Same also applies to US and Germany.
And that is where the issue with HA starts because 100 people most likely have at least 10 and at worst 100 different definitions about it and it is harder to “balance” historical shit than errr “arcade” shit.
You can change dmg and BR rating and whatnot but not really historical dates.
In case of Japan, issue can be “easily” solved by matter of queues and whatnot.
1 Like
It needs to go up to BR4 so Tigers could be played there otherwise your HA is a lie.
You need Leningrad, Manchuria and other maps as incentive otherwise nobody will be playing as Soviets at BR5 as those maps are pretty bad and they will lose their minds even more
So are we getting Fedorov Avtomat and PPSH-41 box/drum there too? It’s a peak of historical accuracy
There were like 20-30 Tigers in the whole Tunisa whereas the were 0 Panthers, Jumbo, M18, 76 shermans…
Br4 Tunisia would be as unhistorical as Br5 tunisia
As said in the Original post, it is suggested that you can dissable the HA matchmaking and enjoy your PPSH and Fedorov at Br5… along AS-44 and RD-44
1 Like
There were also zero Panzer III B, Pumas and Semos there and I am not sure about the III E either.
Then it would be historical with Tigers thank you for agreeing with me, rest is not my problem. Five Churchills should be going against Tiger 1 at BR4 that’s only HA you need.
You are moving the goalpost, Fedorov at BR1-2 along with PPS-41 box/drum at BR1-3 is your HA dream coming true so why are you running from it mate?
BS - something not being there does not break HA, however something being there that wasn’t actually does.
Yeah sure mate, I Obviously asked for for Fedorov and PPsh to Br1…
Whatever
But please feel free to enjoy BR5 HVAR spam in Tunisia so you can enlighten us with one of the “germany suffer” post that you seem to love so much.
1 Like
idk why it is taking forever for preferred maps option. Is it that complicated? Literally taking years…
Stop daydreaming. The so-called “preferred map” is just a like/dislike system that allows you to dislike 2-3 maps. I don’t understand why so many ppl have such unrealistic high hope for a pointless system. It’s the same as Warthudner based on the wording of our CM.
I am glad to be proven wrong, but df simply doesn’t have a good enough record. It takes more than a year to separate br3 from br5. So I don’t think it is realistic to ask for anything complicated from the devs, HA or not.
2 Likes