Most ppl don’t really know the difference…
If they don’t SEE the dangling belt out of the drum, for them it’s not a belt…
I wonder if the 1919 came with a box they’d think it’s magazine fed 
3 Likes
The difference being those weapons would have been designed for infantry. The MG-81Z would be practically impossible and is jumping from experimental weaponry to complete fantasy.
That said, I’m still in favor of the MG-81 infantry variant being added alongside the MG-08/15.
1 Like
the fact you would be correct with that speaks alot to how special needs this community actually is
2 Likes
At this point adding fantansy stuff will be not noticed since we got a lot of prototypes which ruined HA and things similar to it
Except it’s complete fiction at this point. Like the weapon never existed for infantry and never could. You might as well give soldiers a shoulder fired Flak-88 at that point.
And like I said, there was a very real variant of the MG-81 converted for infantry use. Just use that instead of a fictional version of the aircraft gun.
1 Like
just a little memory from parrot, DF got many reasons because why GE need a belt fed mg
and many more will come in a future = )
1 Like
well no coments MG-81? MG-81 Z? i dont care, if it has at least 100 bullets : )
With a 250 belt to be Amazing
History and gun nerds - especially WW2 nerds are super super sensitive when it comes to even the slightest details.
And I am proud to be one of those nerds.
4 Likes
yes 
There are now Fantasy weapons in the research tree the AS-44, RD-44 and T-20,There is no problem adding a Light Machine Gun that can be carried without any problem by the Infantry even if that version is only for airplanes.
1 Like
oh i am not saying special needs in a good way, i’ve seen enough teutonic horseshoes to know the difference
2 Likes
Most people know and dont care.
1 Like
Hm, I don’t know, are we crying too much? Personally I think we have been very rational in the past months or so.
I know there was a post-war conversion of the infantry variant that fired 7.62 Nato at around 1200 rpm and had a 100 or 150 round belts. Idk if the WW2 infantry version mirrored this or not, but I do know one existed during the war. Personally, that’s good enough for me. Make it an event weapon to balance out against the stinger
you are putting WAY to much faith in this community
nope i am talking about the vast majority of the community since special needs is a kind way for me to say retarded
1 Like
Again, there’s a difference between experimental weapons, and complete fabrications
1 Like
I’m sure you’ll get it when the Allies get the M3 and its variants
1 Like
You are right, one is complete and fought in WW2 and the other is NOT, even though they are complete like the weapons. T-20, AS-44,RD-44