well, less people using them, less of the class being annoying i’d argue.
a " nerf " that i can get behind.
Everyone knows it’s a meme at this point and DF hates kill zones and they only choose the stupid options for some reason
dam 1 heure (hour in french) in and we are already at 100 this is the recently most heated argument this week
I was always under impression, any event thing that was, bought/introduced into game was meant, (cough down the road), meant to be added to regular tree eventually?
Stop thinking about the old days things change and tactics evolve especially on steam
the only event thing going into the tech tree,
was the m2/m3 mortar of the americans.
the rest remained unique and rare, and never got introduced in any tree.
so… i’m not sure where you got those impressions from.
1 Like
That’s because the paratrooper apocalypse is real and people need to understand how much danger we’re in
Yet you gatekeep paras with all their new mechanics.
Hipocrisy.
They are.
I just joined a game, I want paras, oh no! I need to pay for them.
What consistency? Since when paywalling a mechanic is “consistency”?
1 Like
they don’t evolve.
it will be more of a slaughter fest.
which giving them paras will not be beneficial for anyone.
Tell that to DF and this stupid trailer and we wouldn’t be here if it wasn’t for them
it’s not gatekeeping?
gatekeeping means only an ammount of specific individuals get to use those said squads and no one else.
in enlisted, that’s completely the opposite.
it is still partially limited, but you can access them if you do the event or buy them.
a minimum requirement.
or wait for an event.
i suppose just a matter of opinions.
it’s not only paywalled.
you can get your hands on those / these any time there’s an event.
sooner or later, there is always one.
Just saying i was under this impression,
why would i just like invent a thought like this
that someone must of said something somewhere to , give me this impression, in first place
you can’t be naive to think the trailer somehow overrepresent the game.
for the most part, it’s alright.
just the normal " cinematic " of many games.
so idk what do you have against the trailer or how causes any issues.
IF they do get added, they need to seriously adjust balancing of how to counter them.
First and foremost by making the aircraft spawn all the way back at the aircraft re-arm point, and be highly susceptible to aircraft and AA fire, as well as long delay between deployment.
By doing it this way, it will be far less effective as a spam tool and actually require coordination to use.
1 Like
All I want is ppl to take responsibility for their actions.
If you thought that paras were fine, why do you oppose giving them to f2p in the tech tree?
If you thought that they are badly designed (like me), give them freely to everybody and see the world burn awaiting the change that should be made long ago.
1 Like
steam players will be expecting their own paratroopers eventually and with how things are going we’re gonna eventually get a tech tree variant
3 Likes
Are these two always like this(Grey Parrot and Erika)?
that’s rich
idk.
being here over an hour telling you why?
no.
because paras despite being frequent, are not as frequent as it would be by giving it to everyone.
the impact are not the same.
it’s like complaining about federov / stgs that are too powerfull and then give to everyone a 9 man squad with just those weapons.
the weapon it self it’s not the problem, but how it gets distribuited.
you feel me?
not entirely settled yet.
we have a saying for the moment.
( or maybe not. )
makes no difference to me.
i’ll probably isolate my self in the editor either way.