This is a neural network that I launched only yesterday, how long does an artist need to study and work to produce such a result?) But again, I don’t care how and what avatars will be made, I just want them to be of good quality and available to players. This is not the case now.
I propose to give people the choice they deserve.
A) How many times do we have to tell you that artists do as many works as they’re commissioned and paid for, no more, no less.
B) And you keep pretending that your personal taste is synonymous with quality. You’d better quit that, it makes you sound incredibly entitled.
3 Likes
happy SS Obersturmbannführer
I spent a couple of minutes for the sake of experiment
A) What difference does it make to me how much they were paid and how bad their skills are if I see a disgusting result?
B) What does it matter what my taste is? I want normal avatars in the game, so that there are not 40 of them, but at least a couple of hundred, so that the player can choose the one he likes, make it out of himself by approving it from the developer and receiving an award for this work.
when someone uses and/or distributes copyrighted stuff they can be sued for infringing the rights. you may think this is innocent with just avatars, but people are already experimenting with making AI generated assets in games and chatgpt can make code.
single person would in near future more or less have means to make AAA game without knowing how to code or make models. but such game would lose almost all copyright protection.
1 Like
You keep repeating “only 40 pics in 2 years” like it was artist’s fault for being lazy. Why on earth should he do more, if he got asked that amount?
In fact, it doesn’t matter at all, yet you keep spitting on current art calling it “terrible quality” just because YOU don’t like it.
“I like cream and dislike chocolate, so chocolate is totally gross and this shop shouldn’t sell it, there should be only different flavours of cream”
1 Like
Now there is a fuss, like the appearance of a camera, when artists protested against its appearance. Or as with the appearance of cars, when the owners of horses and stables had seats in parliament in every possible way restricted cars. So where are these horses now?) Progress cannot be stopped)
I repeat, I don’t care in what relationship the employer has with the artist. I don’t like the quality and quantity of avatars. I suggested an option in which you can solve the problem. I repeat once again - there is a problem, a solution has been proposed. I absolutely don’t care how avatars will be drawn, even with a tongue, even with a pencil, even with a neural network. The result and quantity are important to me.
YOU have a problem with pics.
You suggested a drastic change to address a problem YOU have.
Others apparently have no problems with current art. And, so far, your suggestion is unpopular.
It is not popular for some reason only in the American segment, in the RU cluster a lot of people expressed support. Perhaps there are many artists on this side who make a living from this and see neural networks as a threat. To which I will answer once again - adapt or die out, the law of evolution)
this is not about progress. this is about money. if game developers cant copyright game, they cant earn money. almost anyone can pirate their stuff without repercussions and can even reuse their code and assets. also there is whole value proposition. why should customers pay loads of money for ai generated stuff? before it had value cause it represented countless hours and money company had to invest in order to produce art, assets and code that were unique to that game. and what it represents now? someone who made few prompts to ai art generator? something that can be found anywhere on the internet?
AI generated stuff will come to game industry, but it will still need transformative human touch.
2 Likes
The only thing that will be required is quality control. As for stealing, the artist also steals other people’s ideas, copies styles, mixing them and getting his own, this is exactly what the neural network does. Only makes it better and faster. Look at what the neural network gave out two years ago, and what is now, now imagine what will happen in two years. Why would developers spend money on an artist when in two years any student can create an image no worse than a modern classic, and even in five minutes?)
cause no copyright.
I think that spamming even more AI pics will surely help you getting your point through, keep it up.
2 Likes
Will you find an identical image, for example, of this picture?)
I’m sure not, because it’s unique)
Just showing the result, which can be spent no more than a MINUTE on one image, how much would you draw something like that?)))
you dont seem to understand copyright.
here is example of infringing copyright and that company should be ok with use of this image like this if they dont have copyright.
Do you understand that for Nazi symbols you will be banned not only on the forum but also in the game?)
this is not nazi symbol 
