what no…you give it tracks which increases the hull armor to the point where m72, the shell that jumbo uses, will be almost entirely ineffective
And it would be perfectly balanced, two tanks which cannot penetrate each other frontally. Still better than the joke we have now, alternative history Normandy with Jumbos, which you can only ever pen through a single pixel in the machine gun port.
you and ricky are the 2 most dense people on here. luckily i dont have to read your bs anymore, both of you are on ignore list. why do I consider you dense? because you do not tolerate any other opinion than your own and you back it up with noob playstyle.
please stop projecting, because these two jumbos are dead in part of my panzer 3N that’s the pro of thinking and breathing at the same time
Irony here is that when ever the discussion is about the allied stuff, lets say jumbo. Its magically entirely balanced as you can always flank it aka its just matter of skill disregarding entirely stats of the said equipment.
But now as you joined the M2 / FG conversation suddenly stats does matter.
So stats are viable argument when ever they fits your biased needs.
And ofc your own “weapon accuracy” stats.
WTF happened to this thread? Also the comment below is not only off topic, but also toxic as hell…
Also if the topic is real, in WT, M10 is at 3.7, while the lowest Panther is at 5.3.
nah, tiger is much better
I guess that months of dealing with idiots on this forum can make you “dense”.
And to be clear, I tolerate other opinions than my own, I just don’t agree with them.
then you need to give jumbo and sherman m61 APCBC, the one with explosive filler, instead of m72 that they currently have…so it would be much easier from programming side to give 4H track armor instead
dont care about programming shiet, if it’s hard it’s a game after all, tiger is much more better option
and that’s your opinion but you also have to remember that the 75mm m3 cannon that the sherman and jumbo uses has penetration capabilities below 100
just flank it, the side armor are 80mm
82* and yeah i would do that but tanks like stuart and m8, which is more likely to be the common tanks to see, can’t do that , they just simply don’t have the capability to do it. though if you really want tiger then you must consider what will happen next, allies will likely get pershing and germans the KTs which will 100% powercreep the existing tanks panther and jumbo are already on the verge of that so instead of going down that slippery slope we just modify an existing tank to fill the role of a heavy tank
a high level tank arent necessarily must be killable by low level tank to begin with, so… 🤷
except special case where all german tank cant penetrate jumbo while all US tank still can penetrate all German tank
in a head on engagement yes the 75mm m3 AP, m72, can easily go through all german tanks, but something interesting happens when you start to angle the hull of the 4H then the AP round can only go through the angled in side of the hull or the mg/driver’s ports which is why i want track armor for the 4H so you don’t have to angle your hull as much to be safe
replacing it with tiger fix both problem, frontally strong and stronger while angling. classic 1 stone 2 bird
no it wouldn’t…it will make it worse since now we’ve gone down the slippery slope of power creep as that will case the american mains to cry for pershing or even super pershing and now we’ll have tiger 2s clubbing stuarts/scotts and pershings clubbing pumas/3ns
Regarding the BAR pure truth, I’d love to reduce the MG’s rate of fire to BAR level. The BAR has a light vertical recoil that is easy to control because of the rate of fire, while the MG pulls sideways because of the horizontal recoil and rate of fire.
Jumbo 5.3, Pz4 H - 4.3 BUT ITS FAIR.
Tiger and Jumbo is equal, i explained it to you many times yet you cant understand it but i understand since you doesnt look like someone who can understand complicated stuff .
they can just git gud and flank it, problem solved