how about i list the stats for you, and note bold stats are the better stat of the 2
m2: 680-750 RPM, 7.2 damage, 2.8 reload, 54 vert recoil, 18 hort recoil
FG: 680-750 RPM, 12.0 damge, 2.6 reload, 47 vert recoil, 20 hort recoil
so maybe YOU need to learn to play you fucking delusional retard
But you forgot that average FG player is retard so your stats means nothing.
Also the M2’s bigger magazine compensates fully the differencies.
AND if you still for some odd reason actually think FG is better than M2, then you just use M2 in entirely wrong manner. You just need to use your M2’s pros to your advantage, if thats too much of asked then you can always flank.
No need to be butthurt, just l2p.
Just give up Ricky. Judging by (all of) his posts, he is a type of guy that knows all and knows da best so you are wasting time.
no u also remember i’m a carbine purist, so i only use carbines no other american guns i use
Then you have even less reasons to shed tears here. Go be awesome carbinist and wipe off those tears.
you’re right…i should have kept my cool…
except i’m not shedding tears, in fact i show no emotion
seriously what’s the relevance between Certain weapon purpose with how many soldier it can kill if all bullet hit all enemy(assuming you are super godly player with 1000000% accuracy that super super lucky to found 20 visible enemy visible that is somehow dont trying to kill you or something)
even if you do that M2 will still win so far because 90/2 is 45 downed enemy and total damage output is around 8*90 = 720 while FG42 is 12.7 * 40 = 508, that’s around 40% more damage than FG42, seriously what’s wrong? what is this constant strawman argument keeping the conversation flow away from main topic? it was about tank then suddenly become hOw MaNy KiLl Fg42 CaN gEt WiTh 1 MaG. my goodness, why did i keep faling for this slippery slope trap 
irrelevant, you got lucky which mean you i assume didnt spend money for that order and “lucky” isnt counted in this matter in the end the system is going to be removed anyway
if you are trying to find which weapon similar to FG42 then it’s breda, i said it above
again theoretically numbers because video game though it is entirely possible to hit all of your shots if you take your time with semi automatics but most people won’t be able to hit though hence the word theoretically.
though the point is that it’s possible but you’ll never know if someone has a full starred weapon so it wouldn’t matter in context
nope the quote is of you saying “BARa1” not breda, in fact breda was not mentioned here but here is why i say BARa1 is similar to FG
Wasn’t that thread originally about tanks? Why do we have to endure pointless fg vs m2 talk again? 
so you do admit these are invalid and irrelevant form the topic, btw the odd of that happening is as big as 0.0000085% chance (100%×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2×2)
so? what’s the relevance between how many star someone has in their weapon with the topic?
you are suppoosed to be literate, yound lad
idk but do you want to end it here and agree to disagree?
the only i thing i literally do from start to here is just countering your strawman, random, and Irrelevant argument since i cant left argument left without counter argument to stop it spreading and make it worse
i probably will stop if you stop or just completely forget your existence
I blame OP for this. It’s his fault lol
eveeything start from this, the root of the problem
Lets add the M36 then.
As historical as the Jumbo ^^
nah, give them M18 so i can watch them whinning about it’s potato armor then i reply “just flank it, git gud” like they always do to Pz4H
oooor we could just give p4h more damn armor
Why not? I love the M18 Hellcat. So I can finally show the Wehraboos and the retarded M5 drivers how to use speed.
yeah, like replacing it with tiger for more armor
