oh yeah, cosmetics + capabilities of vehicles.
Yeah still not historically accurated.
Moscow on BR 1-5ā¦
I donāt even know how to describe this stupidity.
It has nothing to do with the HA because 90% of the equipment from br 1 to br 10 the Red Army had in 1941.
Full HA is a lack of balance in the equipment.
Full HA would have to be balanced at the deployment point. I Each piece of equipment had to have a cost. And so, with the Germans, only at the end of the war would you have low-cost equipment.
ill simplify it for you: weaponry is based on historical facts(not ācosmeticsā)
as soldiers uniforms and appearance and capabilities of the vehicles in the game.
cosmetic is just a fallacy u made up
Are they actually? No. But they are publicized as such, u were wrong, u just wont admit couse it would delgitimize your attitude.
appearance & capabilities.
Which
Appearance = Cosmetics
Capabilities = PPsh having 71 drum / Mp40 32 drum. Which technically could be considered as well as cosmetics since thats only thing they have in common with theyr historical counterparts.
this is such vague claim that considering the state of the game it exactly means pretty much just cosmetics.
Well we actually had the exact vague description in the game faq here as well.
It got removed since people pretty much understood that vague claim as they wished it.
Going strong on the definitional retreat, clearly not moving from there.
I give up.
Yeah being specific is quite important.
Grammar is the difference between helping your uncle, Jack, off a horse, and helping your uncle, Jackoff, a horse.
And then close with the uno reverse.
The devs are very flexible when it comes to this.
The Jumbo is pretty much their statement on that.
i know, they lie trough their theets. Also shown by their continuous shadowmods