How do YOU see the future of this game?

If you ask me the Revenge of the Sith has already started.

Questionable.

And who is who?

Enlisted is Anakin turning Darth and Gaijin is Palpatine

And we are Obi-Wan?

Some more WWII content, then gradual expansion towards more modern conflicts (possibly even backwards to WWI?) until most of XX century theaters and weapons are featured.

and the younglings in the temple are the playerbase

1 Like

Judging from the average iq & skill of the playerbase, more like the sand people

True but i am pro genociding the sand people.

Well. At the end, both would be slaughtered by Ani ehh DF/ Enlisted and were no match for the butcher.

Could either go to same way as heroes and generals so basically a game that started out with promise but got fucked into the ground by its developers.

Or the developers could start fixing the game and making changes based on good community feedback. Thus making the game good a lot better.

I hope in the future that enlisted improves and doesn’t end up like a failed game with promise like heroes and generals with a dead player base.

1 Like

By looking the course that Gaijin with their War thunder have passed through, I can predict few things that will happen in the future:

  1. Powercreep. Oh yeah we can’t say Gaijin without powercreep. Especially with current linear progress system, powercreep in inevitable.

  2. Some super weapon from the future in a campaign that shouldn’t be there under name of ā€œbalanceā€. If anyone played War thunder once, it is hard to not know R3. Similar things will be in Enlisted too. In fact, it is already in game such as Jumbo.

  3. Copy paste. It is already in game. Though, it is kinda in the boundary of understandable except some cases. The problem is that they will add copy paste in place of more unique things. This is also already in game. When we see Tunisia axis where the half of techtree is from german even though plenty of them can be changed to italian one.

1 Like

Not very bright if they wont redesign campaign progress.
Hundreds of thousands of XP to get to the next level that brings nothing new is not very appealing. Took me a month to realize how shallow this is, now I’m barely playing because what for…?

2 Likes

Good question.

It all comes down to the campaign system, it needs to be transformed to ā€œFrontsā€ so that the game can keep adding new maps, new locations and new units, famous battlefields and operations.

Otherwise, this wont last.

They have trapped themselves already development wise due to campaign system.

4-5 Different fronts are enough, definitely. Then it is all about making them deeper and deeper, for example there should be so many different maps out there that they are almost impossible to remember by hard. Many different game and victory modes as well as significant amount of units.

Stalingrad, Operation Market Garden, Battle of Bulge, 1945 fights in after the fall of Berlin, Kursk, everything is still missing.

There is a a lot to do, if this game manages to overcome the development trap then it can literally become THE WWII FPS that everyone plays and keep running this system for decades while piling up a huge amount of money.

1 Like

image

Invasion is getting old, they need to redesign it or make it better, cramming your men in a single building starts to become not fun

2 Likes

With my eyes. :eyes:

I dont know how its gonna be but i hope there will me more maps, bigger maps, more weapons, less pace, more realism. :smiley:

3 Likes

Imo the game will become f2p CoD ww2 (even though I’d like to be wrong here). I see no reason for it to fail hard as devs seem to take care of the problems sooner or later.

Mmmh.
Depends. Devs are really present, so that part is healthy. There’s also a LOT of maps which are very detailed and even pretty (Tunisian architecture with all those flowers vines… seriously I sometimes stop mid fight just to admire how good the details are)

So content wise, game is good, and they keep adding stuff.

I’m a bit concerned about some nerfs aspects, such as the useless semis nerfs, and possible future weapons nerfs. Done right there wouldn’t be any issues and it would even be beneficial to the game.
Done poorly and without any good or REAL reason like for semis ( the ā€œrealisticā€ aspect keo keeps bringing to defend this is ridiculous, as it was more realistic pre nerf), without considering how it will impact the game (because of it, people use a bit more sf rifles and new players have no counter anymore) it will merely create new problems. Or an H&G.

Overall, I’m hopeful. I like Enlisted and might stick a while as long as have fun.

2 Likes

Maybe not frontiers but eras so we could ge ā€œmodern eraā€, ā€œCold War eraā€, ect