there is unnecessary stuff not squad,
also if you get rid of squad you gut monetization
premium time means nothing without a squad to spend silver and xp on
also tanks and planes become op when playing against soldier
also no one is going to buy premium solder the way they buy premium squads
even warthunder has tank crews, getting rid of squads would mean rewriting how tanks and planes work
ok what does warthunder have to do with enlisted
the same company own both
but there not going to spend a few hundred million on a cod level overhaul
shotgun is still ass though, there’s a reason why shotgun was banned
where not in enlisted we got a new shotgun
Yes, exactly… the bots are there to give some breather between the average player… they are effectively target practice yet have some moments that mimic cheaters.
Yes, I kitted out 3 rifleman squads of fg 42s SO i can use them as fodder… i send them in the direction opposite of me to distract bots and real players while i make a flank… they usually will take out some of them while serving as distraction.
Symptom of call of duty/battlefield player.
Eyesight issue… inability to distinguish friendly and enemy uniforms and lack of awareness on the map.
Your “stupid magazine system” is when you shoot 10 bullets out of a 30 rd mag and when you reload you stuff that 20/30 rd mag in your pocket to use when you have used all of your ammo… that’s not stupid that’s logic.
This game may be arcade shooter but you done get to continuously reload to top of your mags like you can in other shooters.
Once again a symptom of call of duty/battlefield player… god forbid the game showcase any semblance of realism.
If you want to praise BF1 so much why don’t we make all automatic weapons fire pattern based on RNG? The only good thing about that game was the atmosphere.
This ain’t battlefield but an entirely different game… you need to adapt and learn to play the game if you want to enjoy… not be stuck in your old ways.
Why are you comparing a game released 10 years ago by a major company like EA to a studio of around 200 people let alone this being the subsidiary - darkflow… furthermore even at all because games can be unique.
Also you can’t even use the normal matchmaker feature as it always sends you to your own game making it so you are sort of forced to pick and not roll the dice.
How about… you just stick to BF1.
I don’t think anybody would mind if you did considering this entire post is to dumb down what makes this game special… stick to what you enjoy instead of trying to drag others down to your level.
AI used to be much stronger and it almost felt like you playing an RTS at times - being part of the battle instead of being a one man army.
Its very sad that the devs toned down AI effectiveness back in the days, and I still miss it alot.
Seems like OP just doesn’t like Enlisted. Which is fine.
I will never understand why people love BF1 so much - its literally the game that made me quit the entire series, never played a Battlefield game again after being disappointed with BF1.
BF2, Bad Company, and BF3 are legendary - BF1 is just chaos without any structure, terrible gameplay.
the least they can do is make the game as simple as WAR THUNDER where the grind is much simplier, only tech tree and modification NOTHING ELSE
THAT MEAN remove eveything except weapon upgrade and tech tree
IF they insisting to make the as complicated as it is then AT LEAST make them all level based and automatically activated/upgraded, like linear upgrades
- you are comparing pay to play game against free to play game. f2p games need complexity so they can monetize on more stuff.
- you are comparing totally different genres of games.
no
bf1 is 3$, it’s as cheap as free game
that what happen when the dev trying to add bunch of useless stuff to make it “FUN” for themself but not fun for actual player
certainly 3$
not to mention most of the people bought the game when it was 60$
too bad for you, even i got BF5 for free from amazon prime
which you pay ~180$ per year… certainly it is “for free”…
amazon FREE trial let you claim the game for FREE
Dude wtf,
I got plenty of kills with shotguns. The shotgun has not been banned in game or in real life.
Just no, if anything the health perk should no longer exist artificially making damage even higher. I play enlisted because it isn’t battlefield nor call of duty. It fits in a sweet spot between milsim and arcade. Having to shoot someone many many times for them to die like warzone and battlefield just doesn’t feel good. Neither does dieing in one bullet from guns like smgs and automatic rifles like in mil-sim.
Could the bots be improved? Yes, but it’s actually integral to the game that they stay worse than the average casual player.
What do you mean by movement? The game is becoming more and more fast paced. I personally like a slower game so i am not for anything that improves/makes running and gunning with smgs even more powerful as they already dominate the game as a whole and we have almost already lost the slow rifle play in BR1/2.
Magazine system is amazing. It’s adds a touch of realism which again is why i play enlisted. It also would encourage and make smg play stronger. I see no reason why the mag system needs to be made completely fictional like all other arcade shooters.
Bots suck, more so then most games I have played in my life, but IMOP they were made for enemy cannon fodder. I most often lose 75% of my squads no where close to the cap point just running to get there. They have the intelligence of a retarded three year old. I don’t expect any improvement with them.
its funnier when they randomly died even tho you did everything right to keep them alive lol. placing them n a building away from any objective or active shoot outs with anti personnel mines everywhere but somehow they are dead when you need to switch to another troop
NTM that my Radioman dies first I would estimate 80-90%
of the time, usually within the first 10-20 seconds of
spawning, coincidence? I honestly think it has
to be in the games algorithm, or am I just an Enlisted game
conspiracy theorist?