squads is not whats wrong with enlisted its whats right, we have dozens of single soldier online services. there is only one fps that’s squad based without being an rts. i think i played one or two matches of cuisine royale i dont like battle royales. any game where you get one life without a respawn isa a no start for me.
i might agree with altering time to kill and user interface to make it simpler fort new players. maybe an in depth tutorial on how to play would help. but nothing that removes squad or progression. done
because the market prefer single soldier more and enlisted is playing with fire
you like squad mode and defend it because you dont feel “die” when killed?
while in single soldier mode you’d get pissed when you die because cant take revenge so you prefer squad mode
i didnt say anything about removing the research based system
because the market prefer single soldier more and enlisted is playing with fire
you like squad mode and defend it because you dont feel “die” when killed?
while in single soldier mode you’d get pissed because you die and you dont like that feeling so you prefer squad mode
so what have the game automatically choose perks for you
automatically decide which squad upgrades and weapons are research no thank you
which is why they removed solo from enlisted because is was so popular
yeah i and most the player base prefer squad cause i can get single soldier play anywhere of a hundred places
enlisted cant compete with call of duty battlefield or any other fps and its not trying to
it lacks the budget, the single player, the graphics, the number of employees ect ect
its competing with hell let loose which is dying far faster than enlisted
removes perks, makes everything just normal and equal
well it isnt squad based anymore so remove it, also remove star based buff
tf? type properly, man
like i said, the damage is too high for solo, in solo you dont have sacrificial pawn to check the danger and this game also dont have flare like BF1, rushing will only get you killed by sniper
it can because it’s free
enlisted has war thunder money and my suggestion is merely just adjustment by removing unnecessary stuffs
there is unnecessary stuff not squad,
also if you get rid of squad you gut monetization
premium time means nothing without a squad to spend silver and xp on
also tanks and planes become op when playing against soldier
also no one is going to buy premium solder the way they buy premium squads
even warthunder has tank crews, getting rid of squads would mean rewriting how tanks and planes work
ok what does warthunder have to do with enlisted
the same company own both
but there not going to spend a few hundred million on a cod level overhaul
Yes, exactly… the bots are there to give some breather between the average player… they are effectively target practice yet have some moments that mimic cheaters.
Yes, I kitted out 3 rifleman squads of fg 42s SO i can use them as fodder… i send them in the direction opposite of me to distract bots and real players while i make a flank… they usually will take out some of them while serving as distraction.
Symptom of call of duty/battlefield player.
Eyesight issue… inability to distinguish friendly and enemy uniforms and lack of awareness on the map.
Your “stupid magazine system” is when you shoot 10 bullets out of a 30 rd mag and when you reload you stuff that 20/30 rd mag in your pocket to use when you have used all of your ammo… that’s not stupid that’s logic.
This game may be arcade shooter but you done get to continuously reload to top of your mags like you can in other shooters.
Once again a symptom of call of duty/battlefield player… god forbid the game showcase any semblance of realism.
If you want to praise BF1 so much why don’t we make all automatic weapons fire pattern based on RNG? The only good thing about that game was the atmosphere.
This ain’t battlefield but an entirely different game… you need to adapt and learn to play the game if you want to enjoy… not be stuck in your old ways.
Why are you comparing a game released 10 years ago by a major company like EA to a studio of around 200 people let alone this being the subsidiary - darkflow… furthermore even at all because games can be unique.
Also you can’t even use the normal matchmaker feature as it always sends you to your own game making it so you are sort of forced to pick and not roll the dice.
I don’t think anybody would mind if you did considering this entire post is to dumb down what makes this game special… stick to what you enjoy instead of trying to drag others down to your level.
I will never understand why people love BF1 so much - its literally the game that made me quit the entire series, never played a Battlefield game again after being disappointed with BF1.
BF2, Bad Company, and BF3 are legendary - BF1 is just chaos without any structure, terrible gameplay.
the least they can do is make the game as simple as WAR THUNDER where the grind is much simplier, only tech tree and modification NOTHING ELSE
THAT MEAN remove eveything except weapon upgrade and tech tree
IF they insisting to make the as complicated as it is then AT LEAST make them all level based and automatically activated/upgraded, like linear upgrades
