russia, germany, gernany, russiam italy, not real, germany
i would like more to see new locations but 
like what you like
I think adding the ability to give each soldier an auto rifle and a rifle grenade launcher was a mistake. It should have been a separate soldier class or hidden in GO.
1 Like
[quote=“c4qph2, post:21, topic:168086”]y
Yes, the ability to give this super rare weapon to every soldier is also annoying and turns the WWII game into an FG-42 simulator.
[/quote]
brother i agree
move fg42s to paratroopers, remove all sf and sf scoped
move m2 to assault and remove hyde 42 and federov and that jop abominating
remove all other ars but the stg44 from tech tree especially scoped
the stg44 is secial 500k made tens of thousands saw service
2 Likes
I think it would be an interesting decision to transfer the stg to the machine gun class. As far as I remember, this weapon started to be used as a erzatz-machine gun (like the autorifles in many armies). And the player will have a choice between the MG and the STG.
Still, I like the solution with the introduction of a new class for this - veteran. Veteran is the only class that can use automatic rifles and rifle grenade launchers. Maximum 4 veteran soldiers per rifle squad and 2 for all other squads.
It is also possible to limit rifle grenade launchers in this way - regular grenade launchers only for assaulters, and cumulative ones for anti-armor.
1 Like
Anyway，Enlisted not should be limited in ww2，it can be a better game with more contents
（always using the top auto rifles will let me get bored）
Maybe you want to use the BR3smg and some LMGs as a BR5 specialist weapon?
Oh ，Im not this meaning，I just like to enlisted could include more countries and more weapons from different times（most of the guns I have played for many times）
1 Like
IMO, it would be nice to see some conflicts in the game shortly before or shortly after WWII, like Korea, Indochina, the Spanish Civil War, the Winter War. Maybe even WWI and a little earlier like the Boxer Rebellion and the Boer War.
However, I know how our devs work and in that case we will see the MP3008 in Verdun and the MIG-15 in Stalingrad. I really don’t want to see that.
1 Like
Thats fine just separate the game
ww2 and cold war i just dont want to see in the same modes
ak47 or m14s in Berlin
or Rpg7’s or any cold war weapons taking out tiger tanks
korean maps with ww2 and cold war weapons
ww2 weapons in wars and battles they dont belong 
cold war weapons in ww2 battles and maps
thats the problem like world of tanks you would need to separate game/modes
2 Likes
Maybe they should separate by new maps，but I guess DF not so many capacity to finish even if a new battlefield
1 Like
I would really like a squad of 4 PPSh with drums and 3 with boxes. Or with 3 MG-42 or STG and four MP-40 (preferably BR3 modification with increased rate of fire). Or a squad of 6 engineers with type 100. Or a squad with 3 M1919 and four BAR or Thompson box.
France has a lot of cool weapons that I would really like to see implemented. Automatic MAS-44, regular MAS-44, MAS-40, Darn machine gun and so on.
If we bring up the WWI weapons (although I am far from a fan of them), we can recall the Ribeyrolle carbine, the Chauchat-Ribeyrolle, and the automatic version of the Winchester 1907.
2 Likes
Sounds like the same shit as in warthunder.
2 Likes
Ahh，new countries，not bad.But what can I say？The mess room in game also spend over 1
year but nothing happen.So DF no plan do new things maybe is the performance of lacking capacity
1 Like
There adding ussr vs jp if rummors are true, i would like the korean war
I dont want ww2 cold war editon
1 Like
After all, it’s much easier to order 100 new shitty skins for 2 bucks from Indian dudes on a freelance than to do something really cool.
Enlisted players would love to fight or at least tolerate fighting WW1 WW2 Korea vietname they don’t want a tiger tank fighting a bmp3 they dont want warthunder, they at the very least want ww2 complete with minor things like France.
1 Like
- it hasnt, it will next year
- adding new random content instead of solving core game issues is the most common mistake ever & sign of low creativity & bad mangement. enlisted already has more than enough of that & doesnt need more.
- simply put: adding vietnam would not lead to a net growth of the playerbase, cost high amounts of time/money & throw the game back 1 year as core game quality improvment would suffer meanwhile. same is currently going on @HLL and many player there critisize exactly that.
3 Likes
Gaijin has stated many things in the past and then changed their mind later, the value of their word is low.
But yeah, I dont see Enlisted going beyond WW2, especially with how slow and sad the development cycle is.
1 Like
HLL is ridiculous, the original game is poorly optimized, it doesn’t even have half the content of other games, they’ve only released clothing DLC and they want to make another game?? xD
It’s like they want to release Enlisted 2 when it’s not even out of beta xD
1 Like
I played it once and never have again for that exact reason. At least I got it for free from the Epic Games store.