Give Japanese new faction to fight

[generalpanther]

Meanwhile the 105mm can basically one shot every japanese tank it sees or finds due to weak armor/open top.

It’s so stupid that the US begs for stuff like that then says Japan doesn’t need stuff as I’ve had a few guys tell me “Japan is so strong! Japan is full of good players and doesn’t need anything!”

[Veekay45]

@SlavicUnionGamin

would also be historically accurate to what happened.

Ah yes the famous fights between wooden mockup Hori and Tokyo smg that exploded in trial vs IS-2 and AS-44.

No actually we need Khalkhin Gol battles only for soviet and Japanese BR1.

[Darenius1]

@Veekay45

Ah yes the famous fights between wooden hori and Tokyo smg that exploded in trial vs IS-2 and AS-44.

Dont forget the IS 3 that need to be added or USSR would suffer agains japan.

[Veekay45]

@Dregomz

i’m tired of Stalingrad at all BRs

Yes that’s why it should be only for BR 1-3, that’s clear as day.

@Darenius1

IS 3

No thank you, enough fantasy land already.

[MissingMayhem13]

Aye I just made this post a few days ago! Let’s like it up! I want to see this very much. Let’s make suggestions on it so DF sees it!

[MissingMayhem13]

Addition of Japanese and Soviet conflicts

Hey my fellow Enlisted compatriots and fellow forum users. I propose an idea of a modest and historical concept. I would like to see the addition of a Russo/Soviet map and battlefield where BRI-III Japanese and Russians can fight and battle over areas of NorthEast Asia a the islands north of Japan. It would allow the early players of Japan have the ability to play against a fighting force and players who are relatively evenly matched, vehicles are very similar in caliber and crew size etc. I…

[HX1997]

Nope Japan doesn’t have the player base. I see no point in splitting the Japanese.

[HX1997]

I guess I will never understand darkflow logic.

[SlavicUnionGamin]

bruh the IS3 didn’t get put into the soviet army until after WW2 ended, the only time it showed up was in the Victory parade in 1945. by then the war had ended.

[SlavicUnionGamin]

your not the smartest are you?

[Adamnpee]

Prototype was made in 1944.

We have so many prototypes from 44 in game already, so I don’t see any problem whatsoever.

[SlavicUnionGamin]

ok… well Germany is screwed then, finally Germany will suffer at BR5 like it is supposed to

[Greyparrots]

I’ve just noticed this topic and I’m just reminding everyone the Soviets have 10% damage reduction body armor and I don’t think the Japanese will fare too well against that

[SlavicUnionGamin]

well shit

[Greyparrots]

You didn’t know that was in the game and some lovely people in our community are going to low BR to massacre new players with squads decked out and body armor ?

[SlavicUnionGamin]

how about they do this instead, make the Soviets and Japanese fight at br1, in a border conflicts
Soviet–Japanese border conflicts - Wikipedia that way it will be more fair

[Greyparrots]

doesn’t work and people can bring body armor to any level in seal club if you’re playing Soviets

[SlavicUnionGamin]

what does having body armor have anything to do with anything, body armor is mainly useless against rifles.

[SzepWaxweiler]

@SlavicUnionGamin

ok… well Germany is screwed then, finally Germany will suffer at BR5 like it is supposed to

Nah they can balance IS-3 with 10.5 Tiger 2 as long as IS-3 is balanced I don’t see any problem to be added

[Greyparrots]

If you use vitality and the knockdown perk and Medic you can be a troll and it gets even worse when you use full nine man squads