Germany didn't need MP-40 and 38 to be B.R2

[FurinaDeFontaine1]

@robihr

no you didnt. putting it in the ROF doesnt make absolutely any sense when data shown in the table is by the bullet recoil.

@FurinaDeFontaine_1

Pretty sure I already answered this with the fact it has a higher ROF, not to mention the slight differences in manufacture and shorter barrel length whilst keeping the same velocity as the PPS-42.

robihr:

Yes, I already explained, see quote above. ^

@robihr

your whole argument about mp40 being better than pps42 and pps43 is full of strawmans arguments and you dont see me complaining…

I explained how they’re better than the PPS guns… Nowhere in my points did I ever twist words, I saw a flawed argument and corrected it. You however, attempted to completely sway it into a direction that involved modern SMGs nobody ever mentioned or brought up.

@robihr

like i said before, mp40 didnt need to go to BR2, it was pps42 and 43 that needed to go to BR3.

Wrong, it’s the other way around.

@XxNelsonSHxX

Dude Average Soviet SMG recoil is 8 while germans are 12,

But yet the German SMGs are easier to control in full auto due to the lower RoF.

@XxNelsonSHxX

why the hell you think soviet gun are less controllable than german ones? You are using your feeling as argument is just plain stupid

Because their obscene RoF makes them uncontrollable as such…

…Right… So I imagine when they designed things such as the 1928 Thompson and MG-59 LMG, they slowed the RoF “just because” their feelings? The 1918A2 BAR slowfiring mode as a whole… Or when the Soviets issued AVS-36s to their troops, they were instructed to use them in semi-auto? Or why our troops disliked the M14 in full-auto and preferred the M16 over it? Nothing to do with controlling the weapon or anything, right?
Must I keep going?

[YuiHibiki]

Topic is closed as it has turned into a fight of personal insult as i have warned before. Discussion can be resumed if the OP request the thread to be reopened and cleaned.