btw from brittanica:
from stalingrad mp40:
when upgraded ~500 rpm
also moscow mp40
when upgraded 575 rpm
1 Like
Nah, I am just saying it wasnât something exceptional in comparison to others WWII. They all had theirs problems lol.
But I guess itâs easy to just pick one tank and shit about it.
You are acting like it was worse than tons of t26s and BTs lmao.
3 Likes
Yet they didnt blow up on the same rates.
And its worth to mention that the 85 had radios and five crew members and had a lower blow up rate compared to its former variants.
And all that while the Soviets more or less used same methods as in 41 except they had more supplies and were attacking now while the Germans also geared more fire power and Fäuste.
Im sorry that I dont talk about tanks from the 30âs or so the Soviets didnt even produce anymore and focus on âoneâ tank the Soviets happened to mass build throughout the entire war. Shame on me I guess.
1 Like
thatâs why even pak40 did about half hits without penetration lol
1 Like
tell us about Soviet tactics more, we just forgot that âenemy at gatesâ-like crap didnât we
5 Likes
Yeah, because that was not my point. 
Even if the developers buffed it for âbalance,â it should be done in Berlin, not in Moscow. The Federov overperforms in every way compared to the MKB. It has a higher rate of fire (+200, +250), better dispersion, and superior damage. With the 40 recoil perk, it is considered the best gun in the game
Even if devs buffed it for âbalanceâ it has to be done in berlin not in moscow, it overperforms in everyway mkb
3 Likes
also for fedorov:
source: Fedorov Avtomat | Military Wiki | Fandom
source: https://collections.royalarmouries.org/first-world-war/type/rac-narrative-151
fedorov has conflicting information cause somewhere it is 350-400 and somewhere it is 600.
1 Like
and why then were the 75 mm guns developed and the Panzer 4 upgraded?
Dunno mate. How advanced are their tactics if they manage to keep losing 2x more troops and gear than the Germans all the time?
thatâs why they lost all the t34 they had at the start of barbarossa because pak40 couldnât destroy them
2x more is if being such idiot to write civil losses to military. in that way Soviets still win just because they were more humanic than europeans for all of ther freakin history lol
5 Likes
Yeah That one was dumber.
of course they did. your grossfatter told that?)
4 Likes
to destroy superior american and briâish armor
superior
meanwhile Sherman in 44 and Pershing in 45 xDDDD
2 Likes
What a surprise when you enemy is definitely weaker than he before, without oil, without air support, without superior tactics because fuhrer.
Those autistic numbers doesnât say anything about quality of tank itself. Thatâs not how life work.
I could say every single tank during wwii was trash and I would be right.
1 Like
nah you can just read soviet and german repports on the internet and not this Z crap
1 Like
most of the losses were due to the abandonment of tanks without the possibility of repair. And the T-34 and kv were pierced only by 88 mm flak guns. The 37 mm guns were just garbage
5 Likes
all we need is to read freakin reports CJ!! but of course gameng experts never do. especially english speaking sadly
2 Likes