See WW2 online for that is awesome but is old very old, planetside 2 is a more recent example
1 Like
Let´s add rework of premium squads so they can reflect F2P squads in composition and weaponry of additional soldiers (all of them).
It would be nice step out of shady monetization practices… since we already got rid of lootboxes.
6 Likes
God everyone has been asking for this for awhile sadly it seems the devs listen to certain things then not listen to the other certain things.
There still practicing it and they always will its a gajin game…
1 Like
At this point I’m sure devs have some kind of a contract that disalows them to to this.
But I don’t know with who. With the devil?
3 Likes
i am sure it is the same people wo came up with the idea of calling premium squad in stalingrad “legendary” to sell them, their marketing department for sure the same one of EA
3 Likes
If you allow an add-on: forget the console theme. Not because I look down on them, but because most of them suffer and go nowhere. While their presence only increases the number of staff, the value of the team is rarely. I’ve seen a very good console player before (I’m not sure he played with a controller), but most … whoever plays a mouse-keyboard on a console, it makes sense, but don’t torture others by not being good to anyone else, as they’re raped by the pc players.
I get the point, money. But most just leave it out of the game anyway, because it can’t prevail.
1 Like
I support that idea as well as getting rid of redundant weapons like the Soviets RM-40 or Germans PZB-39 but I also wish medics actually had a real motive in the game people don’t care in this days the doctors. It would also be a good idea to include squads of other nationalities, both for the axis and for the allies.
Reelaborar mapas, algunos realmente me parecen muy pequeños, casi sin ruta para flanquear, además estoy cansado de pelear en un callejón o en una casita donde gana el que tira más explosivos.
2 Likes
completely agree with you and hope the devs listen to you and work on improving the game before adding new stuff
Thanks for the attention
no, thank you for saying this
2 Likes
this would be a problem as there is a vocal minority and a silent majority, and both have different views, from my understanding is since this is a f2p game the slient majority is casual players that do not want a competitive arcade game and the vocal minority dont want a realistic based game
Oooh look a ProGamer with PC WooooW.
In Real Life you got No Friends or?
1 Like
In its current form progression is little more than punishment for not paying (enough). Don’t think I’ve ever seen anything this bad in an online game.
People have been complaining about varous aspects of progression since alpha, but things only kept getting worse over time. There were minor improvements as well, of course, but they are drowning in the sea of bad.
2 Likes
Oh and remove crossplay… or at least for the old consoles.
1 Like
Don’t remove it, just allow it to be toggled like consoles.
We get a bad rap, but there are a Lot of good console players out there.
I would hate to lose the ability to play with the PC friends I’ve made over the time I’ve played this game.
2 Likes
Its not necessary (just) due to the lower amount of skilled players, but rather the (partly massive) amount of time and work to make the game compatible for consoles, especially the older ones. Unless ofc there are many consoles around here, which is a good reason to keep them here, but at least I face way less of then compared to the past months.
Because most of them flee away after beign used like xp farm in all campaign
While mention nothing about fixing dispersion
The game follow the Cod arcade approach dispersion is sadly one of the shooting cardinal point of this system
Tbh Cod has less shot dispersion compared with this game
Because Cod has a more high ttk than enlisted, in cod you need half mag for kill one in enlisted 1 or 2 bullets
Dev thinking
Very low ttk time+more dispersion= belanced gameplay 
Then I would prefer very long ttk time + less dispersion