Forum meme

This is impossible. Whether Stalin, Mao Zedong, Castro or Kim Il Sung, they are firm and tough fighters. They will not be angry because of your slander, but will only feel sad

1 Like

And how many of those nations were run into the ground by the party
So far China has lasted the longest next to Cuba if I remember right
Slavs ran theirs into the dirt in by the 80s lmfao
The originals like Lenin and Trotsky may have had great ideals, but the men who came after weren’t as strong of character and used their power for personal gain.

I propose to ban these forum thugs. Because they are addicted to personal attacks @1942786

no. Stalin, Mao Zedong and others achieved surprising industrialization
It is their industrialization that makes the country strong, so your country should slander them because it is afraid

I wasn’t denying that progress was made, just that the men became corrupt and hurt their own nation.

The US outshined all until our mongrel business leaders and politicians sent all of our industry to China and other nations for a quick buck. Which has come to hamstring us decades later.

1 Like

Mao Zedong and Stalin were the people who opposed corruption most. In our country, corruption criminals were directly sentenced to death to warn officials.
Nowadays, embezzlers only have to pay fines and go to prison for a few years. This has led to a significant increase in corruption in our country

1 Like

Before the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States did a good job. However, when the United States lost its biggest competitor, it began to decline

1 Like

I wouldn’t lump Stalin in with the corrupt, no but men around him abused their position and took advantage of his paranoid mind.
Beria is specifically the one I had in mind when saying this, but I can’t name anyone else off the top of my head that sticks out like that.

That’s for damn sure

1 Like

Compared with Beria, yerov is the biggest butcher. So Stalin realized this and changed the leader of the Ministry of internal affairs. Yes, too many people are killed, but there is no corruption. It’s just that some people in the Ministry of internal affairs use their authority to eliminate dissidents.

Mao Zedong realized true democracy during the Cultural Revolution: he directly listened to the opinions of the people at the bottom. However, at that time, the education level of the Chinese people was still insufficient, leading them to misinterpret Marxist theory and seize the “counter revolution” indiscriminately. At that time, two groups of organizations fought against each other: Mao Zedong and the masses’ organizations and bureaucrats’ organizations. With the bureaucrats’ victory and the death of Mao Zedong, they were able to put all the bad things they had done on Mao Zedong

Believe it or not I really have no criticism for mao other than the meme kill the sparrows and make steel in your backyard things.
He was a good guy as far as I’m concerned

1 Like

Thank you for your objective evaluation of him!

These two policies have certain functions:
At first, sparrows robbed us of our food, so we should kill some. Unfortunately, too many sparrows were killed.
Fortunately, now that the sparrows are back, there are a few annoying cries on the tree by my window.
The quality of steel smelting in the backyard is indeed a little poor. This is also the reason why the masses do not have enough knowledge: they even throw the iron pot into the stove! Before the founding of new China, the illiteracy rate in China exceeded 95%. I know that Mao Zedong tried his best to improve the level of education, but it is still not enough: it is impossible to cultivate illiterate people into high school students in ten years

Yeah if anything I’d call those two policies specifically idealistic but maybe a bit immature? Idk if thats the right word
Well intentioned regardless

1 Like

:wink:THANKS.

You should watch these two
My friends and I watched the first one after it came out and its absolutely a 10/10 movie
We’re gonna watch the second one sometime next week

I watched the first one. To be honest, it has some problems: it exaggerates heroism too much, but does not reflect the tactics of our army, nor does it reflect the international communist spirit of our soldiers.
At the same time, there are some modifications to historical events.
But it’s still OK

Yeah its a propaganda piece, but not in a distasteful way
Its a very fun movie even with that knowledge

1 Like

You really don’t seem to have anything to do

this took like 4 minutes to make, and I’m not the one writing 3 page paragraphs every single time I get criticism while pinging 10 people for no reason.

2 Likes

别 在 这 理 发 店
:clown_face:

You kindergarten child hung me up on this post for so long without any reason.
But I won’t be angry because of children. I will contact your kindergarten teacher next time.