Fix the monetization to fix the game and population

Dude, Enlisted is a Team Deathmatch game of 10 vs 10.

Have you ever seen Battlefield calling himself an MMO?

Enlisted is 10vs10 and Battlefield is 64vs64, you play, level up, unlock content, etc…

Hell Let Loose has 50vs50 matches, that game is more similar to an MMO than Enlisted, have you ever seen anyone calling that game an mmo?

Even COD has 12vs12 matches.

Enlisted is a WW2 shooter, thats it, doesnt matter how the marketing department wants to sell it.

4 Likes

Well my great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandparents had to grind grain for flour so we should not complain ever

1 Like

This game IS NOT AN MMO ffs

1 Like

A 30 min game gives me 30 to 50 k xp average.
If I play 2 matches per day I can compleat a 180k level in less than 3 days. A campaign both sides in less than a month.

Star wars the old repubblic is not an mmo?

Same i do one level of 180k in 9 hour 2 days of play

1 Like

I meant Enlisted.

I have played MMOs since Runed of Magic, if has a decent population i have played it.

Defiance, for example, was a shooter MMO, Firefall, even all those Stalker clones.

But Enlisted is not.

the new halo shouldn’t be too but it has adopted the same form for grinding technically today every game where you have to grind and has a multiplayer can be called mmo, the old mmo are dead and only FFXIV is left

Thats on premium, and with good game knowledge.
We can’t base grind on top5% of players, look at leaderboards and most poeple are doing 30% of our scores. Sure they will get better, if they stick around.
I’m just tired of carrying teams everygame, at least have some teammates that don’t just run with started rifles and camp spawns all day, that why we prefer bots, they are unaware of how fcked they are and just march forward.
With less grind You will finally have some actual teammates, and not just lucking around to getting 3 players in one team stomping the other one

With less grind, you will have exacly the same playerbase.

Since
A: you don’t queue with a pre made team
B there is no comunication
C its a casual game where the users don’t have nothing to loose, when loosing a match besides a xp that they can get in the Next batle.
D : There is no ranking system, so bad players will be bad players.
E : I personally couldn’t care less if I loose a match since I ill get the xp eventually, I play for the win, for my own xp. I couldn’t care less about my teamates. If I loose I loose. Lol all I care is what I can do to have the best experience by myself. How many points I can capture, how much can I defend alone, how many tanks I can destroy etc.

It’s rare I finish a game at second place. Rare. But on the other hand, since I have nothing to loose, I rather quit some matches and move on. Again… Nothing, nothing to loose or prove to anyone.

If the team is present, good. If isn’t, I ill try alone. I get Alot of satisfaction when I win a match Prety much alone, but If I loose it. I wont blame my team. I was part of it too.

But after all, for ex. if I loose with 7k base score. I will still win more xp than the guy that own against me with a 3k score. So it’s all good for me.

People loose their minds over teamates they can’t control.
It’s a fking casual game, casual. Nothing to loose besides some xp numbers.
You need another batle to rank? Either you enjoy the game for the gameplay, or, if you play only for the grind, this isn’t the right game for you.

There is more in the game besides grind and wins. Alot more.

People just care about xp, teamates etc. And forget about what matters on this casual game.

Game will get old fast for people that only care about xp.

If you, as many of us, do amazing in-game, loosing it’s only a small percentage of xp you loose on the overall scale.

5 Likes

In the forum, a lot of people, have created a number of topics, with very good suggestions for game developers on how to improve the overall style of Premium Squads. The issue of perfection of them still hangs in the air somewhere and is certainly not resolved yet. However, I don’t see the direct negative impact on the game, from premium squads at the moment. Also, bearing in mind the fact that basically premium squads are now in the very bad stage. The whole fundamental point of these squads is unique weapons not available to anyone else, and an xp bonus. After losing this element, these squads basically no longer make sense.

However, it is also the fact, that some premium squads are better and others is completely useless. Most of them consist of 4/5 troops, and at further levels of the campaign this becomes a huge problem. At the same time, those 4 weapons, (some really very good) just melt into the gameplay as a whole. Not doing any direct impact.

For me personally, as a collector, these squads are like a hobby. Yes I like them. But I would even say the opposite too. That for the prices we pay for these squads, they don’t meet the immediate needs of the game. And they just need to be further improved to justify their price.

6 Likes

It’s 50%, if you played axis tunisia on launch, now they do better. I woulnd’t say thats small, 20 more hours to grind.
Every match i play with premade teammates we win, sure fun talking shit, rarely any challange.
I get that it’s a casual game, people often quit games, rarely anyone plays for objective. That’s fine by me.

I just had most fun i this game fighting like crazy in normandy just to cap single point. Every player rushing like crazy, bombs falling and people still fighting.
Most of this died down now, maybe had 3 good close games this month, and in one game bugged me out and kicked me.
Maybe this is just becoming something not for me, i’ll just play something else. But there was something diffrent in playing with everyone since day one, everyone scrambling to get that one extra smg, picking up guns to survive a bit longer on point.
Will propably get that fg 42 2 and play 2 matches untill i quit of boredom

hmmm which is better? a 7 man squad that can have soldiers with different jobs and can all carry automatics or just 4 guys with SMGs? here is another good one; which is better, a 4 man only engineer squad that you have to pay for ooor a 6 man free engineer squad

4 Likes

OP is why we will never get premium squads relevant to gameplay at all.

1 Like

well 3 premiums are relevant just that most of them such one trick horses that why bother, same with the event squads too

People like ghostofishmael or OSTLAND are fine with Premium squads because they enjoy P2W mechanics.

At least OSTLAND accepts it, while ghostofishmael just screams and try to offend like a pathetic baby.

Kiddo, the adults are talking, stfu, you likke shit outcast virgin fuck, your shit comments are not constructive, learn from OSTLAND.

3 Likes

Your math is way off on this. 30k - 50k avg is an avg of 40k per game or 80k per day.
At that rate, a single faction would take over 40 days…a full campaign would take 89 days.

false advertising, how is enlisted an mmo

the only mmo is planetside and that game was too ahead of its time to survive

And isn’t 80k per day a less than 3 day to do 180k?

Untill level 24 or so, it’s less Than 140k xp per rank.

How tf it goes to 80days?

Either way, leveling a campaign it’s as easy as it gets with premium and amazing xps per match. The problem is leveling useless squads like Flametrowers mortars etc etc.

Premium squads suck ass, what are you smoking

2 Likes