To the sides, both turret and hull. Easily pennable, the easiest choice for when you fight against any T-34s on 3Js.
To the front of the turret, not in the gun mantle, but just to the side of it. You can pen it, most of the time, and its not a very small target either. Don’t bother with the hull, you have to be at very specific angles compared to it to pen it.
its about as effective vs Soviet tanks as T-70 vs German tanks… which is, flanking is probably the safest option, but you are not fucking helpless against T-70/T-34 if you face them head on. not so much with KV-1, but its still pennable to the sides of the hull.
As for Moscow itself, personaly I feel there is nothing either side can’t bring to level the field. Early levels might be better for soviet side, but besides avs and Fedorov /MG I think Germans have competitive tools, weapons and vehicles to deal with any soviet counterpart, if not better.
Sometimes, if not most of the times, its all on who fights by your side.
I never said that it couldn’t be won or that it was totally unbalanced, in the post I don’t talk about the campaign in general, I talk about the weapons and especially the tanks.
Starting there, as for the other thing: At this point it has become an excuse. It doesn’t matter what you complain about, they give you the “it will be fixed in the merger” card. The worst of all is that it never comes from a developer, this answer is given to you by randoms who don’t even know who lives in their house, much less are they going to knowing what the merger will bring…
About the fusion… I don’t expect anything from it since the update of the new mechanics for the tanks. After seeing how something so simple broke the entire game and they still haven’t given solutions, something as big as the fusion I don’t even expect what it is capable of doing.
After all, seeing how incapable the developers are of implementing anything without breaking the game or optimizing it later, I just don’t expect much from the “merge.”
I, as a player, don’t agree much there is unbalance on Moscow. Again as I stated above, Germans do have more than enough to deal with anything allies throw at them.
But, it’s just a humble opinion as a player.
Tbh all this time I still think Germans do have the best card on most scenarios. But, as a player, I fully agree mileage may vary
There are trully good players faithfull to allies side, but, in none aspect Germany lacks behind.
idk what is the point of this topic. you expect devs that have their hands full with merge and fixing loads of bugs to somehow magically fix campaign that is out for 3 years? and most of the unbalance in moscow comes not from equipment, but from playerbase. certainly there are some shit matchups like pz2 vs t34, but there is no fixing that before merge.
I’ve seen bigger games with fewer staff, much better managed. Not to mention that for the time the game has been running they haven’t solved the most essential thing…
While finding a balance is difficult, the problem is that developers don’t even bother looking for it.
Now as for the other thing, you say that they are “busy” with the merger… If that were the case, they would not have released the new tank repair mechanic. So if they are working on other things, they are releasing events with new troops (troops that they must create and schedule) one event after another since the previous one did not end long ago.
Therefore they are not “busy” if they have time to release one event after another. So they could dedicate that time and effort to fix it.
It’s pretty stupid how people try to defend developers tooth and nail as if they were paid xD
They should at least try to debate with brains instead of insulting or trying to make me feel guilty for complaining about a game as if Darflow were a child I bullied.
“they try to give you contrary perspectives” The only thing you, a failure, have done since I first saw you on the forum is insult me… Are you talking about constructive criticism?? which is it?
In this forum I have only seen 2-3 people comment correctly and I have debated those people but never insulted them. But you don’t even have the brain to understand the post and you come to talk about critical debate… You who don’t have a single bit of gray matter in your skull.
If from the beginning you had not dedicated yourself to insulting me and belittling my posts, I would never have responded to you like now, but you don’t have an ounce of brain, education or even reading comprehension, you are just a waste of oxygen and space in the world because you are of no use. .
Nothing you’ve posted so far comes even remotely close to a constructive debate, you’re just torturing the only neuron you have left to respond to me so you can finally leave humiliated.
Not evenalready in the forum, even in the game you show how useless and lacking in gray matter you are. When not even gives you the brain to understand a bit of what I publish and still have the nerve to comment believing yourself well… I can’t help but feel sorry for you, and for your parents who had to raise you to finally convert you. in garbage that can only receive humiliation in a forum.
well if you ever worked as programmer in a team you would know that there is division of jobs. using all programmers for one job is not effective. not to mention for merger you need multiple departments so even though development of some elements is over, they may need to wait for other department to finish their part of the job.
events have nothing to do with programming and they only need to have 3d modelers make new skin for existing troops (they didnt need to make paratrooper mechanic from scratch) and put it in existing event format. 3d modelers should have nothing to do with merge process, same as mappers.
