Well, for a second I thought they had a clue what they we’re doing once they added kiraly to moscow to compete with ppsh instead of the super m38 with massive 20mag.
But now T-34 vs PZ J1
And premium squads Katyashka rocket launcher platform vs absolutely most loved rifle G41 as sniper version.
“Thanks”
“Really thanks”
The way I see it, in the next few weeks, you will meet A LOT of players with those: The players who already had maxed the campaign will come back to grind it. Then those will get bored and leave again 
The British used large numbers of Thompson submachine guns, and they did use the 50 round drum on the early ones that they received
They need more cool Italian squads and equipment instead of more of the same old rehashed German stuff from all the other campaigns.
Maybe then people would be more interested in playing axis Tunisia
My guy the bar is better than the mg34 by a mile since you can actually fire accurately while standing and without having the bipod bolted onto a surface like a window or floor
A german soldier cries about the lend-lease act, circa 1941.
The Brits were also the only people who have records of them using the Thompson with the 100 round drum, so…
USMC, During the early campaign in the Pacific use them as well
I have no records of the USMC using the 100 round drum, or drums in general, everything I have ever read was that the US refused to issue drums to any of their armed forces for a variety of issues, but the Marines are a crafty bunch and maybe they smuggled a bunch to places they were not supposed to be, who knows.
oh yes BAR behaves like an assault rifle ever since its introduction to this game so yeah BAR is actually kinda more usefull now than it should be… but that will change with stalingrads mechanics added
Once when you will get 300% boost and get the battle where NO TEAMWORK exists because you got bots on your side or people with less than two braincells that cant bother to use ingame chat, you shall remind yourself these words you said in here… I absolutely understand why the guy is mad about this… such contrasts in matchmaking should not happen especially when you get penalised if you leave the already lost battle and lose your boost
Even with stalingrad mechanics the breda which is also a small mag lmg behaves more or less like a bar, lower recoil and high accuracy
I agree with you on this one unlike others in here who can only ramble about how great of a mistake it was to call drum mag thompson unfair and not suitable in tunisian campaign…
unfortunately this kind of thompson should be available from the very beginning to the tunis allies in enlisted BUT AT THE COST OF WAY MORE SILVER ORDERS than just one or two… but rather 3 … in reality it was so expensive weapon to brits that they paid for it with their golden government reserves at start of north african campaign so the same should be in here
I have 50 round drums being used, I will try and dig up the reference for you, it was in the SWPA, photographic evidence
Alright, I’ll take your word on it.
Certainly rare, the 1928 drum mag, in USMC use, but given the lax criteria for inclusion in Enlisted, it’s actually havening been used in action would put well ahead of many guns in the reality department.
Yeah, a drum Thompson in the hands of US personnel in WW2 would be about on par as a Federov or and AVS 36 in the hands of a Russian solider, which as both of those being in Berlin demonstrate, would be fine
he means except stamina so the recoil will change
