I strongly disagree with your opinion about the panther. the panther fought in Normandy, was the thunderstorm of all the Allied tanks of those years, and that is why you want this magnificent machine that can knock out jumbo to be taken out of the game. Are you out of your mind? You are not surprised by the fact that jumbo is A HEAVY TANK that DID NOT EXIST IN NORMANDY, ON OMAHA BEACH! Do you consider it normal that the Puma armored personnel carrier is at war with Sherman, jumbo? What kind of “player for Germany” are you if you are for preserving the imbalance, where a heavy tank with 152 mm frontal armor can stand in the field, and ONLY AVIATION can destroy it? In general, why is the jumbo option not tiger 1? Jumbo was designed as a deterrent to the threat of tigers, not pz 4 tanks. I am for the introduction of a panther, I don’t care about the howling of small children who, if they reach jumbo, will shoot German boys on spawn without pity. They will not doubt, they will feed on the pain of other players. This must be stopped!
Chad thunder Jumbo
God my legs are trembling this feels SO good. Thanks for the suggestion @ErikaKalkbrenner
Imagine dying ever lmao 
No it wasn’t - it was designed to survive assaulting infantry fortifications where there would be a high concentration of AT weapons. The standard German Pak 40 could easily penetrate Shermans at expected ranges, let alone static 88’s.
That is why it is designated “Assault Tank”
With the 75 it wasn’t a “deterrent” for anything.
How dare you have the Jumbo it is the most op thing and is unfair!! “Stomps foot on floor” poor German players
Germany needs Panther that is 100% fair vs the bad guy US players. Those meanies. Hell give a Tiger to make it more fair and even.
… wut?
absolutely not,
that’s why removing the jumbo as well solve the issue.
is it that hard to read?
i don’t expect you to read everything i type, but no.
it is not the first time. i already made at least 2 post about it and milions of comments.
so no, i’m not surprised since it shouldn’t be here in the first place.
you see, as long the puma can actually take out the sherman frontally, and vice versa i don’t see anything wrong with it.
it’s when it comes to flanking.
normally, i’m not agaisnt that either. if it wasn’t for the fact that in enlisted milions of others factors plays in. at the point where it’s just THIS campaign where to win against a jumbo, you have to flank it.
i dont’ recall this “”“playstyle”"" in any other campaign. as such, i don’t see why it should be made here any different.
unless you want to kill a campaign which it’s what they are doing.
think about it smart boi,
you can unlock much earlier or directly buy the jumbo.
compared to the panther.
guess what, you have to grind for it.
grind just to be able to deal with the threat.
so it’s a +1 for jumbo once again, and a merely +0.5 for a panther,
you don’t know what balance is.
i think you are complealty missreaded the whole thread.
might as well ask you one question,
what the hell did you just understood.
because speaking of the earlier balance, how would it be fair for a m5 or m8 to destroy a bloody jumbo? 
once again as i stated previously, german main does not have situational awareness in the first place.
something that you are not showing diffrently.
it wasn’t?
the only thing that should be stopped here, is your idiocy, ( no offence ) and the jumbo.
no powercreeps for any factions actually.
or the jumbo issue is just going to be the beginning.
what next, maus or IS3s over berlin?
who knoes.
either way both tiger, jumbo and pathers breaks the definition and everything what " balance " stands for.
no matter how you put it.
and if you don’t understand it, it’s not justified to give reasons at this behavior.
cool story, next time, keep it to your self.