How many Soviet players do you think have bulletproof vests? And do you think it’s reasonable for players to have to purchase additional bulletproof vests to gain an advantage? FG42-2 has extremely strong killing ability when facing MOST players without bulletproof vests. And you also overlooked the firing rate and recoil of both. May I ask how many matches have you played and come to a conclusion? I have played nearly two thousand Soviet games, and I can tell you clearly that the AVT40 with a 20 round magazine is reasonable.
There is a saying that practice is the only criterion for testing truth. Sincerely suggest that you try wearing armor and using a 15 round magazine to kill 15 enemies holding FG42-2 with the “one hit, one kill” AVT40.
fire rate and recoil only apply after the 1st shot…and since you only need 1 shot at 60 meters its neither here or there
255 post merge battles for soviets, above 3000 battles before merge
90% at BR5
Yes it’s the advantage and i have them on 95% of my soldiers at BR2 and BR5
Rof of FG42 is higher which results in higher recoil than AVT-40
And after those 2k games you still can’t see that AVT-40 kills faster than FG42??? AVT-40 has a fake visual recoil in reality it’s a more accurate and a more deadly weapon (less dispersion too), not only it has better dmg per shot (1hit kill almost always) but also higher muzzle velocity and reload speed.
someone wants Soviets to have all the best guns in the game without a single weaknesses you really want to kill Germany and turn them into a bot nation
If you think that firing rate and recoil are “irrelevant”, then please use a bolt action rifle, which has greater power
It doesn’t seem like we’re playing the same game, at least in the over a thousand Br5 matches I’ve played since the merger, there are very few other players equipped with board armor
what do you think I spent alot of time doing in those 3000 battles before BRS and merge LOL…did you really just compare 660 rounds per minute to a bolt action lol
Don’t forget that Germany has the best technology line machine guns, submachine guns, sniper rifles, as well as the most powerful pass weapons and gold coin squads.
Before the merger, the Soviet Union certainly had an advantage in Moscow and Stalingrad. But now, after the merger, the experience of BR5 matches in the Soviet Union can be compared to Berlin before the merger
you mean just before the merger because the player base sucked. It goes in Cycles, I still remember the PPSh 41 fest Berlin was in the beginning.
also it says you signed up to Enlisted 5th of October this year???..
in fact, the Fedorov Automatic is so bad that it won’t get any better. Besides, there is an event squad of engineers who can use it. it would be unfair to the owners.
It would be better to make it into an automatic rifle, like the Auto Hei.
This is the most delusional post i have ever seen in my life. Soviet main lvl max. While at BR2-3 germany has better MGs at BR5 their MGs are much better in every single way, Axis smgs are all crap and Soviets have best smgs in the game at BR1-5, Soviets have way better soviet rifles. We have BP weapons because our TT weapons are way weaker than of the Soviets, Conders got power creeped by Thompson 100, G43 Kurz got nerfed hard so tell me a single amazing gold weapon order. And where are those powerful “gold coin squads” is this STG45? Kiraly? or maybe Krieghoff FG? The worst paratrooper squad in a game at BR5 or Gerat? Absolutely joke of a weapon. Only good premium are MG42 Early, wz 1928, MG45 and Jagdpanther anything else is dreadful and unplayable.
I registered my account in June last year, so I played less before the merger, but I also knew that the win rate ,in Berlin ,Soviet Union was much lower than in Germany at that time. After the merger, the Soviet Union’s winning rate in 5br remained extremely low, similar to its performance in Berlin before the merger. Therefore, it is reasonable to provide the Soviet Union with an automatic rifle that is comparable to or even slightly stronger than the FG42-2
Please speak with data, not your thoughts. If the power of the Tokarev bullet can reach 6.8; The power of RD44 is equivalent to G43 Kurz, and its firing rate is equivalent to MG15; then I will agree with you. In addition, you have also listed several powerful German gold coin squads. Please list some Soviet squads.
I can’t believe so many people think that even in BR5, Germany’s infantry weapons are inferior to those of the Soviet Union, and Germany’s gold coin squad is “only” a few powerful. It seems that discussing here is useless and will only waste time. I will log in Enlisted, play as Soviet or US, and use my skills to beat more German players
Sooo…instead of basing buffing on the comparison of “actual” attributes on the weapons themselves, you attribute the poor performance of bad players on a faction to a single weapon? Therefore needs buff?..you said you cant view problems statistically, but here you are using the “statistically poor win rate” as the reason for a buff. (Not to mention None of us have access to those statistics)
Like i said, it always comes down to initial argument…it just doesn’t go away. This is just a friendly discussion, but you need to come up with a “good” reason
APC sd. Kfz.251/1, Ersatz M10, Suomi KP/-31, TZ-45, Erma EMP, Pz. III M and maybe Stug III A. Very good squads i had a lot of fun.
There are more german premium squads but not available for new players. And i dont know why…
I have a solution. Use the Gold Order Gorov LMG instead of the AVT-40 for your engineers. This weapon is awesome.
Not better or worse than the Soviet German launchers.
Event and a modified weapon.
SG Exclusive and fires different rounds (iirc).
AVT already got buffed and still has recoil-reducing bayonet. Also, it doesnt face body armor.
Allies perform worse against Japan in Pacific now.
So do they need atomic warheads?
Soviets and some US are better except Madsen.
Lol
Only applies vs US.
Irrelevant for
RMN50 and 90rd PPSH and LAD are also there.
Irrelevant for balance.
LaGG and 100rd DP are also there.
It’s an event squad