Explosive pack problem 2.0

You can fight against pretty much anything with every tank, planes being that exception that doesnt have proper counter on ground.

Theres no LMG tanks that would be only against infantry, or TD’s that would be pretty much only against other tanks.
So no theres no tradeoff when you spawn a tank, you can fight against everything on the field, obv excluding planes.

I get your viewpoint and could even agree with it IF the tanks were hard capped, but they aint for sake of fun / balance. Thus its perfectly balanced to every soldier be capable to use detpacks.

1 Like

Infantry fighting tanks like the Pz I would be a cool addition to be honest.

Im not particularly against hardcapping tanks.

Oh someone got angry :joy: Also ofc i never played Lone fighter ffs

TBH only AT troopers should be able to effectively attack tanks at range, the problem that i have is that the pait, strumpistole, pzb,ptrds are basically mashmellow guns trying to take out tank, and these are trooper that are supposed to take on tanks, and yet the tnt pack is available to all classes making the bomber class redundant

1 Like

zzzreally

Its 11 PM, im going to bed

once panzershrek and bazookas come into play, tanks will be as useless as ever.

just my opinion coz i saw them and use them against IS-2’s and kingtigers in alpha days…
but, some campaigns wont have them…

anti tank shall be a specialized job only for engineers and bombers.
there is not a single reason to choose a bomber right now if you normal trooper can kill a tank with a single tnt pack.
there is not a single reason to choose TNT packs over a grenade. the most common explosive.
there is not a single reason to build AT guns, since you can run into a tank and destroy it.

1 Like

i have so much “fun” with my crappy grb-39 :lying_face:

this:

yep

So because ppl cant play as a team and do such elementary task as move with infantry while in tank or defend friendly tanks from enemy infantry which would make it alot harder to use detpacks.

But we should expect people to choose engineers / bombers that are virtually useless because they want to play like team ?

what
the
fuck?

1 Like

Tankers cant play like a team / Infantry cant play like a team and cover the tanks.

And you expect people to choose dedicated AT squad because all the sudden they want to be useful for theyr team. A squad that is technically useless except on AT duties.

Oh man…

You gotta understand that I’ve lost faith because most OBT players are seemingly the “xX420MlgGamerxX” type that come from CoD World at war or Battlefield V and Heroes & Generals and expect to be able to run and gun aswell as detonate tanks and a room full of people all in one package. Rocking an STG and a Panzerschreck at the same time is their expectation, most likely.

They just won’t accept a dedicated class.

2 Likes

Spoken like a true sigma male

Ironicly, thats exactly what you are asking for tanks.

1 Like

No, tanks are always going to be tanks.

You seem like the type of guy to rush his squad into the open and get mowed down though, so i can understand your frustration, lone wolf.

I don’t need a tank to do that though.

Yeah and currently they are. If you solo or sit still you die simple as that.

Really ? Could have sworn its you who are asking to decrease the amount of AT significantly.
perhaps because you want to sit still and mow down infantry without being interrupted by annoying infantry killing you ?

Good for you BoTsLayeRnIGhtMarE666+69

Yeah thanks but im not the one playing Squads.

So instead of killing squad full of bots you rather kill invidual bots ?
Idk how I should handle this information.

I get 25v25 games all the time, I don’t know what you’re talking about

Players, that is.

I know how to differentiate.