yep, that was my topic and yes we need that to come to all campaigns. Idk why such a basic QOL changes takes so long.
2 Likes
“…which you replace at lvl 5-7…”
So the idea is everyone full auto? that should be the meta?
I prefer the idea of different weapons for different situations. Also, bolt action is a lot of fun, for me, more than any submachine gun or assault rifle (in stalingrad of course), plus that way skillful low levels become really competitive.
But also, we are talking about weapons that are effective at very (very) long range irl. So it’s not unrealistic for 1 shot to kill you at close range.
but anyway, that’s my opinion.
4 Likes
you do know that every bolt-action rifle in service during ww2 uses a round bigger than most large calibre modern day assault rifles? and that most would outright kill or incapacitate you if hit in the chest while weapons like the mp40 and tommy gun would need upwards 6-8 shots to reliably kill or incapacitate, and that all lmgs also use that same sized round as the factions default service rifle
3 Likes
I just played stalingrad with sweaty Russian players bunny hoping with AVT spam, I can assure you bolt action buff will not ruin the game.
3 Likes
recently i realized that i lack long range capabilities (i have full assaulteer line ups), if bolt actions get this buff i would even consider swapping an assalteer squad for a sniper one.
pre firing every angle and wasting bullet like nothing, i swear it make me rember ash mains (rainbow six siege) when the game just launched.
pure run n gun brain dead cancer
2 Likes
Then buff semi-auto rifles and lmgs too, 15.9-17.2 is more than enough damage for BA, more than any Lmg or SA rifle, anything more is fantasy.
Yeah. You play game with progression, BA rifles became outdated and were mostly replaced by SA and auto guns, thats how things should be. And once again, BA are more than viable and adequate already.
I agree, it will just get one step closer to full ruin. What can totally kill the game is other changes to MG, auto guns such as AVT, I mean just compare it in Berlin and Stalingrad, totally dumpstered in Stalingrad. Ppsh also dumpstered for midrange, any mg is killed as a weapon and class. I’m basically against all changes introduced in Stalingrad and neutral towards BA buff.
Nothing more cancerous than explosives or snipers, BA buff just enforces that cowardly camper mentality even more.
trust me fast picking from corners at the spawn shooting with a 1 shot down weapon is more cancerous than a sniper or a retard that trow death packs
1 Like
but then that would be a unfair advantage to new players, and would lead to a dead end in adding gameplay content
Only if semis are re-buffed.
1 Like
Only if all other gunplay changes introduced in stalingrad are removed - the campaign has the worst and least fun gunplay of any campaign in general.
Also, the lethality buffs should only exist for fully upgraded rifles, not stock weapons. Also, in return i would increase long range dispersion of all bolt actions when using regular sights and force players to hold the breath if they want to get a guaranteed hit at longer ranges.
Otherwise maps like normandy and tunisia will be absolute slaughter.
1 Like
Bolt actions are so fun and great in Stalingrad that my favourite weapon in here is…
… The Starter Soviet Mosin carbine, with toothpick bayonet.
I don’t even joke, I love the thing in Stalingrad as it’s just perfectly balanced: fast cycling speed for a bolty, just perfect damage, thanks to Stalingrad bolty buffs, satisfying firing sound, useful bayonet.
In the other campaigns, I rarely use this rifle, as it’s damage output is too low…
5 Likes
You can just get a sniper in your assault squad or give one or two Bolts. thats how i run mine in Stalingrad. I Take the sniper to cover my assaulters and switch into them when they are near the point or just through smoke nades, every assaulter of mine has one to pop a quick screen against snipers.
but at the cost of a machine gunner,
also not an option bc fg42 can go full auto, so its like having mini assualteers
my experience in berlin tell that if you’re not leading your bots, a guy with a ppsh/avt will shred them to death in 0.5 seconds
1 Like
Yeah. You play game with progression, BA rifles became outdated and were mostly replaced by SA and auto guns, thats how things should be. And once again, BA are more than viable and adequate already.
You ust want to shit on noobs then. A full auto squad with fully upgraded semis will be superior in mid an close range anyway. Wasting " shots on one enemy with bolts and snipers is just absurd.
Strong bolts make smoke more of an asset because you actually need it to move over open fields while now a squad can just tank long range fire.
MGs should get a damage buff as well higher dispersion in my opinion.
Oh Berlin i dont play to messy for me, i send my assaulter in one at a time to counter snipe to reveal their Pos, maybe thats why it works better for me.
1 Like
You clearly dont snipe enough you need good fields of fire for that. Tunisia and Stalingrad are the best for that. And one smoke nade goes a long way. You are an automatic whore nothing wrong with that. Wiping a room full of dudes with an PPSH is fun. But in Stalingrad you have to earn it, wich isnt that hard even when you get used to it.
Flamers are great in that campaing as well just smoke youre approach and clear windows on your flanks before the charge, its called tactics.
Wich isnt needed when you can eat bullets with a 35% health perk wich must be removed btw.
The part with holding brath id actually support, i do that anyway so id have an advantage if that would be introduced. 
Automatics will most likely ruin the game as they are now (in my opinion). Not many people are bold enough to state it.
4 Likes