4 Likes
Not gonna lie I genuinely advocate for whomever wasted over 6 months (this was originally for february/march) planning this, and the horrid loadouts, should be fired from the company immediately. This has been overall a catastrophic failure unanimously. Not including the controversies surrounding the event like a certain CM that no longer is a cm (but still works close to the team) lied about not promising an event or anything in the first place, the earnable rewards for being top %s in the event now being turned into 900 gold cash grabs, etc. The dev team needs to rethink themselves quick and form a team of veteran/dedicated players to give them feedback and guidance on events like these before making such stupid decisions. You turn people willing to give lots of $ to support the game into people issuing chargebacks on pre-orders and refusing to buy new prems/content in the future.
6 Likes
Since introduction of random faction queue, itās not really hard to complete daily task in just two battles.
(just casualy flying with bomber, not even sweating)
So far I really do enjoy this event. Even though the rewards are not something I am interested in.
4 Likes
Having the poor and already crippled AI spawn in Ke-Ni tanks is the bottom of the joke for me. As if it werenāt already enough as it is. Give them some proper stuff ffs. The event is something a player couldāve done in a couple hours sitting in the editor messing around. It feels so half assed.
2 Likes
11 Likes
I mean all the AI needed was the same preset as the players, maybe minus the APC and tank/planes.
2 Likes
There are still Type 4 automatic rifles left,arenāt there? Change them all to Type38 or Type Otsu. Get rid of the Type 4 scraps.
1 Like
This event really shows the overall flaws.
The Type 4 is a terrible weapon like a Japanese G41.
The Type Hei late
shouldāve been a TT weapon in BR 3 not BR 4 which does lower DMG and longer reload then SVT 38.
12 Likes
Please replace the lower BR engineer build AT guns in the event. They are not effecting against BR 5 IS-1 and HT No6(Tiger) tanks.
7 Likes
This weapon is much superior to the SVT38 with very low recoil. The Type Hei 10(BR3) is more suitable.
Although I think everything is balanced now. The Japanese have better tanks and better MGs, while the Soviets have the SVT38. The problem with the Japanese is bad players, Iām sure the new Join Any Army doesnāt work properly. Iām having a hard time getting to Japan.
It is not. You have to be very incompetent to say something like that. Type 4 is totally okay and balanced weapon for its BR.
On other hand, SVT-38 is clearly overperforming rifle. And the only tech tree BR3 semi thatās reloaded with mag instead of stripper clip.
Stop pushing this commie approach. Not a single BP weapon for which people paid with real money should be put into tech tree.
It seems like you really want to screw the people who support the game and effectively deprive the game of revenue once they stop playing.
4 Likes
Lower recoil yeah but superior no
We just got what WT has tho I do agree there couldāve been some changes made to make it look some different like this
14 Likes
Yeah nothing stops them from placing their japanese mg on top around the hatch. Or add extra track armor and have new unique camo. Sadly DF got ultra lazy painted it green and call it a day.
For BR5 they should at least do bare minimum to make it more playable, as right now you will get destroyed by infantry as soon as they spot you. You canāt defend yourself with just hull MG. And at BR5 it means death.
4 Likes
it still kinda isā¦ yesterday i had 3 battles where i got ~2.5-3k score, just for last battle to get 7-8k score. vehicles get taken instantly and with infantry it can be sometimes hard to get good score when you are roflstomping enemy.
i mean, the m1 garand reloads all ammo at once and effectively functions as if it reloaded through a magazine
I agree.
Yesterday I had a pretty even conquest where we ended up losing by a very small margin (I rarely use vehicles in conquest, itās not efficient thing to do), followed by a defense match of which I post the screenshot.
Of course if you have some ultra short match, you donāt have time to pump up the score. But by definition short matches donāt last long.
So I think for fairly competent player, this event is matter of playing an hour per day.
More limiting is that you have to participate every day and you canāt miss a single task if you want to get the main reward. Which I understand that for people who arenāt the masters of their time for whatever reason, this can be pretty frustrating.
As I have already said. I really donāt mind this concept - as long as it is not a new standard.
1 Like
M1 garand is quite obvious exception. Having 8 rounds instead of standard 10, but above average dmg for its BR. (SVT-38 still has better reload)
And since Johnson was downtiered to BR3 (btw. Johnson kept its BR4 dmg even after it was put to BR3 for no reason whatsoever, obvious powercreep), thereās always room for buffing garand and uptier it to BR4. Especially since Western allies are lacking BR4 atm.
But itās quite obvious garand still has feel of TT BR3 rifle (stripper clip reload) and its dmg could always be lowered to either 14.4 or 14.9 to fit average BR3 dmg pool.
ā¦unlike SVT-38. Which has literally every aspect of BR4 rifle except for dmg, and not a single relevant downside compared to other BR3 semis. (It has one the best sights on its BR as well, if not the best)
They should either change its reload to stripper clip system only. Or increase its dmg and put it on BR4 in folder with SVT-40.
And I think itās extremely unhealthy to use SVT-38 as example in balance debates. SVT-38 is not average TT BR3 rifle around which every BR3 TT should be balanced around.
Average BR3 TT semis has 10 rounds, stripper clip reload, less than 15 dmg.
1 Like