Dunno if it didnt translate well, but I dont really get your point here.
Well Japan had know idea there was only 3 is the thing, I believe there is a story of how a downed US pilot at the time was captured and when asked about atom bombs, just lied out his ass to say there was hundreds, so by all accounts the Japanese thought there was many more, and who are they to doubt that knowing the industrial might of the US at the time.
As for the effect of atom bombing vs firebombing, put simply firebombing is only effective so many times before there is nothing left to burn, not to mention it took hundreds of bombers at a time to get the desired results. While by all accounts, the Japanese know it only takes a single plane to do 10 times the damage of a firebombing raid. Especially when you consider the wider impacts of atom bombing from the radiation sickness, the outer cones still being set alight, etc etc.
Because it hits a saturation point, also see the point of it taking 100s of planes while are limited for ultimate effect to urban areas. No such issues with atom bombing.
Also its not really the same death if you look at the twisted version of Bushido that was prevalent at the time. Dying in combat was much preferred to dying in fire bombing, still they couldnt firebomb everyone, far from it. And atom bombing is an even worse fate than firebombing in that regard. Honestly this is a topic all of its own, so its very hard to simplify the point here.
I dont know what was anti soviet about that? The fact Im singing fanfare for them? I mean you could make a point for it if I began randomly talking about how they started WW2 or etc, but I digress.
But the point still stands, they were literally training civilians to use bamboo spears to charge US or soviet forces, whoever invaded the home islands first.
Not quite, I have no respect for the Japanese commanders of WW2, however they at least would follow their men in death, down to hell I hope. And this isnt limited to field officers, or even just generals, but all the way up the command chain, in fact many still did kill themselves following the surrender of Japan.
This is a deep topic in regards to what I believe your talking about, the justification of dropping the atom bombs, I mean countless books have been written on it and still there is no consensus on it. However from a purely practical standpoints, millions more would have died should a conventional invasion had taken place, probably millions alone from the direct consequences, perhaps millions more from the indirect consequences, such as via famine or disease or etc.
These millions dont just count allied, whether that be yank, brit, soviet or etc, but honestly mainly the Japanese casualties. However that is a particularly dark bit of alternate history that may not be the best to dwell on.
