Doesn’t M18 have less armor than M10 - but “practically” the same gun?
M10 and M18 seem to be to be very similar, with one having more armor and the other being faster
2 Likes
M10 and M18 are completely different vehicles and not really “simlar” except for having tracks, turret, gun, et - about as simliar to each otehr as they are to the Pershing really!!
The M10 is based on a Sherman chassis, the M18 is on it’s own original chassis.
But you are right about the armour and sped - the M10 inherets lower hull armour from teh Sherman - so hte transmission has 50mm covering. Elsewhere it is 20-25mm and 63mm on the mantlet.
The M18 is 12.7mm everywhere except 25mm on the mantlet.
Neither of htem should be in an infantry game - both were TANK DESTROERS ffs… but … well… this is enlisted so bullshit abounds 
Just try to play them.
M10 is so much worse.
3 Likes
Dont be ridiculous, you know what I mean, two marders we have are also based on different vehicles - but they are obviously similar.
I want to see a STUG IV getting added - just to see you claim how STUG III and STUG IV are totally different vehicles with zero similarities other than them both having tracks and a gun.
If you want this to not be ridiculous don’t start with it being ridiculous 
1 Like
BR 3 is probably for the best, but I guess I wouldn’t mind BR2, they are pretty easy to kill lol
Exept the M18 and M10 are VERY diffrent…
The M10 almost plays like a casemate with its slow af turret but the M18 has a 5 times faster turret rotation speed.
Also did you know that most APHE rounds need to pass through 15mm of armor first before they can explode?
So even when 12.7mm of armor wont bounce any shoots I believe you can figure out yourself why that could still matter.
1 Like