Don't do another Stalingrad

I would In a heartbeat than waste weeks grinding stuff just because…

3 Likes

Snipergrad is a garbage, it’s never about fullautos, but something else

maybe, but it still looks like shit, just because we are wasting our xp to “purple” if we are not even going to buy it. (and it still looks like p2w)
p.s. premium squads are added, so it looks like they’re trying to f* us up

We need to decide on either to complain about snipers or SMG meta.
Otherwise it’s gonna sound like a balanced game.
Can’t have that…

3 Likes

They’re added, but they’re COMPLETELY redundant and unnecessary for anyone owning full access. 100% collector’s stuff.

Moreover:

It is within the realm of possibility that, in major Sales, we may be seeing Stalingrad full access discounted as well.

To be fair even for f2p, everyone can have how many ppsh41 they want, buy a premium ppsh41 squad is… forget that more money to the snail

like ALL other premium squads when you reach high level

2 Likes

Actually, correct.

Except in Stalingrad they’re redundant even from the start.

1 Like

well yes but they said they would not implement any premium squads, and as always DF cant hold a promise.

1 Like

Dude is a “communication difficulty” like keofox said

1 Like

Just because every other premium squad sucks so hard, overpriced more than AAA games.

So yeah it’s a better deal, like selling Your kidney for a beer rather than getting it stolen

Where is it p2W? The Allie’s get the KV1 (one of the best tanks) and it’s FREE

mkb42,no? it was nerfed but still it WAS ptw, and kv is just a big and slow trashcan

1 Like

Stalingrad is just such a rough campaign in the fact that you already had some many campaigns for the F2P player to work at. I mean if you have grinded out all of Normandy why would you ever leave it? The other problem is that with the rapid progression of paid access players in Stalingrad any free to play player is going to be at a disadvantage. The bolt action buffs are great for the base player if you think about it, but the openness of the Stalingrad campaign maps force people into this pot shot style gameplay. I will also say that some of this is the player base fault too. They never use smoke arty to make movement easier, they always just do the air raid bombing run.

Then on top of all those issues you have a campaign that is basically a Moscow campaign/ Berlin hybrid. Both of which are better campaigns than Stalingrad imo.

dont have much hope on this since there is too much cowards dont dare to fight face to face and just grab a bolt rifle and hide behinds walls and windows these cowards always crying about “auto predominat”

nicholas-cage-funny
Yeah. Guess the Jumbo and Tiger are also just big and slow trashcans.

For the love of god…

Could people use one narrative? It doesnt make any sense if one half complains about BA (sniper) spam and the rest about auto spam.

Pick one.

That only shows how balance is in a good place right now.

Stalingrad is now my favourite campaign, just needs more locations, as for snipergrad, I see so many pz tanks sitting back and mg’ ing the first point, not even covering their own troops.

If I take pziv G, I will load HE and pound snipers, defenders on cap, HE is totally underrated on Stalingrad, it kills defenders easily!

I got 90 kills and my team took the point, I saw soviets coming in to retake and opened fired no more counter attacks, Stalingrad takes tactics and skills, most players go sniper and counter snipe each other… that is not point of campaign.

It is nothing like Berlin, or Moscow, it is its own campaign and the balance on BA, LMGs makes a massive difference.

As for bomber spam, I took down 3 bombers yesterday, it’s about positioning, c’mon learn to adapt, I think a lot of players think they can play the same on every campaign… You can’t!

1 Like